Comments on: Book Publisher Looking to the Future http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/ David Lee King is the Digital Branch & Services Manager at the Topeka & Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kate http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Kate Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:15:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/#comment-183 Guess he didn't think it was a cool as you did. The post is gone. Guess he didn’t think it was a cool as you did. The post is gone.

]]> By: Kate http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-24950 Kate Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:15:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/#comment-24950 Guess he didn't think it was a cool as you did. The post is gone. Guess he didn’t think it was a cool as you did. The post is gone.

]]> By: walt http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-182 walt Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:59:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/#comment-182 Without getting into the more extensive discussion: There's a pretty major error in the original article. The Apple iPod Nano may have 16 2-Gb FlashRAM chips--but "b" in this case stands for bit, not byte; 16 2gb chips equals 32 gigabits or 4 gigabytes, the capacity of the Nano. I'd be real surprised if Samsung or anyone else was announcing 16GB (Gigabyte) flashram this year. Without getting into the more extensive discussion: There’s a pretty major error in the original article.

The Apple iPod Nano may have 16 2-Gb FlashRAM chips–but “b” in this case stands for bit, not byte; 16 2gb chips equals 32 gigabits or 4 gigabytes, the capacity of the Nano.

I’d be real surprised if Samsung or anyone else was announcing 16GB (Gigabyte) flashram this year.

]]> By: walt http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-24949 walt Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:59:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/12/12/book-publisher-looking-to-the-future/#comment-24949 Without getting into the more extensive discussion: There's a pretty major error in the original article. The Apple iPod Nano may have 16 2-Gb FlashRAM chips--but "b" in this case stands for bit, not byte; 16 2gb chips equals 32 gigabits or 4 gigabytes, the capacity of the Nano. I'd be real surprised if Samsung or anyone else was announcing 16GB (Gigabyte) flashram this year. Without getting into the more extensive discussion: There’s a pretty major error in the original article.

The Apple iPod Nano may have 16 2-Gb FlashRAM chips–but “b” in this case stands for bit, not byte; 16 2gb chips equals 32 gigabits or 4 gigabytes, the capacity of the Nano.

I’d be real surprised if Samsung or anyone else was announcing 16GB (Gigabyte) flashram this year.

]]>