CIL2006, Day 1: Opening Remarks and Keynote by Chris Sherman

by David Lee King on March 22, 2006

First, for Tom Hogan’s opening remarks:

  • 2380-ish attendees this year!
  • 150 speakers and moderators… wow.
  • 60 exhibitors

***************

Keynote: Search Engine Update, Chris Sherman

Starting to see true differentiation and divergence among the major search engines:

Ask:

  • Jeeves retired. first-class search engine, as good as or better than the others
  • They also have Gary Price
  • Many new tools. Web Answers – a natural laguage search that actually works.
  • great map tool – better than google and yahoo. Even gives driving/walking directions, depending on what you want to do

Google:

  • Google is: advertising company, microsoft killer, ISP, Banker, etc, etc, etc…
  • Not just focused on search anymore
  • Suggest, Q&A, Desktop, Video, etc – lots of options

MSN:

  • still spending money to develop a search engine and a search advertising network
  • You need version 3.0 with all microsoft products… so wait awhile
  • Clustering (sorta like Northern Light used to do)
  • Birdseye and street level imagery – nice satellite imagery

Yahoo

  • Pace seems to have slowed at Yahoo
  • turning into a “people mediated” search – with tagging and personalization
  • Yahoo Mindset – a version of the search engine that has a slider that can be dragged towards shopping or research to personalize search results

Google and Books

  • Google is probably legal
  • Publishers VCR myopia factor – it will probably be better for publishers in the long run – it will help sell more books
  • Publisher will control how much content is displayed – they alwo authorize Google to scan the books
  • You can’t copy or print the text…
  • They plan to link to Worldcat pretty soon
  • Browse full text of public domain materials
  • He thinks they are scanning books so Google can learn and improve search technology…
  • lots of lawsuits

Google’s DoJ Request

  • asked for 1 million random web addresses and records of all Google searches for one week. Other search engines complied! Yikes
  • Google refused because of privacy concerns – good for them.
  • 50k random URLs & 5k queries will be ultimately provided
  • many problems and absurdities with thte request in the first place:
  • won’t show what people are searching for…
  • random URLS don’t show searches, relevance, algorhythms, etc
  • also doesn’t factor in automatic queries

China and search:

  • US is bashing search engines over China censorship
  • But the search engiens are simply obeying the law
  • The Chinese people prefer the censorship to not having search engines at all
  • only a relatively few topics are censored
  • savvy chinese web users know they can reach virtually any web site using a proxy

Conclusions:

  • search is getting exciting again
  • new tools are making content more searchable
  • threats to privacy and individual liberties are subtly increasing in the US, while ironically things seem sto be improving in China

cil2006

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: