<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Types of Website Content? I Don&#8217;t Think So</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/</link>
	<description>David Lee King is the Digital Branch &#38; Services Manager at the Topeka &#38; Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/#comment-23497</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave - Thanks for the comments about my recent article. I should have been more specific, but was short of time when writing it (I&#039;ll be more careful next time!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Sell&quot; content need not be just a transaction-it could be about &#039;selling&#039; an idea, causing someone to do something, etc. For example, the &#039;Sell&#039; content on the website of the UK Labour Party is to get people to vote Labour. The &quot;Sell&quot; content on the website of the World WildLife Fund is to get people to join the organisation (or do something about ecology change). The sell content on Amazon is to get people to buy a book (or a DVD, or a fridge, etc)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &quot;sell&quot; content on my own site is get people to believe in and act on my ideas. I &quot;persuade&quot; them into that by creating a (hopefully) professional appearance (e.g. about me info, photo, privacy details, good secondary content, nice design, etc). I then reassure them they have done the right thing in trusting me by providing content details if they want to complain/compliment me, and newsletter by which they can stay in touch with changes, (a kind-of after sales service) etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A more general example is MySpace. It &#039;persudes&#039; partly through the good testimonials of so many other users. It sells by making is so damn easy to create a new site. It reassures by providing good help and support, and by its efforts to defeat all those nasty guys who use it for fraud and worse. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;UIE had an interesting piece about a similar idea (called Inukshuk content)&lt;br&gt;on their site earlier last year: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave &#8211; Thanks for the comments about my recent article. I should have been more specific, but was short of time when writing it (I&#39;ll be more careful next time!)</p>
<p>&#8220;Sell&#8221; content need not be just a transaction-it could be about &#39;selling&#39; an idea, causing someone to do something, etc. For example, the &#39;Sell&#39; content on the website of the UK Labour Party is to get people to vote Labour. The &#8220;Sell&#8221; content on the website of the World WildLife Fund is to get people to join the organisation (or do something about ecology change). The sell content on Amazon is to get people to buy a book (or a DVD, or a fridge, etc)</p>
<p>The &#8220;sell&#8221; content on my own site is get people to believe in and act on my ideas. I &#8220;persuade&#8221; them into that by creating a (hopefully) professional appearance (e.g. about me info, photo, privacy details, good secondary content, nice design, etc). I then reassure them they have done the right thing in trusting me by providing content details if they want to complain/compliment me, and newsletter by which they can stay in touch with changes, (a kind-of after sales service) etc.</p>
<p>A more general example is MySpace. It &#39;persudes&#39; partly through the good testimonials of so many other users. It sells by making is so damn easy to create a new site. It reassures by providing good help and support, and by its efforts to defeat all those nasty guys who use it for fraud and worse. </p>
<p>UIE had an interesting piece about a similar idea (called Inukshuk content)<br />on their site earlier last year: <a href="https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/" rel="nofollow">https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsen</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-6533</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/#comment-6533</guid>
		<description>Steve Rubel has some interesting statistics on MySpace:
http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/03/myspace_mania.html

In short, 61 + million registered users with 21+ million unique visitors.

If those guys offering free music are not &quot;persuading&quot; or &quot;selling&quot;, I don&#039;t know what the rest of the record industry is doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Rubel has some interesting statistics on MySpace:<br />
<a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/03/myspace_mania.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/03/myspace_mania.html</a></p>
<p>In short, 61 + million registered users with 21+ million unique visitors.</p>
<p>If those guys offering free music are not &#8220;persuading&#8221; or &#8220;selling&#8221;, I don&#8217;t know what the rest of the record industry is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2006/08/14/three-types-of-website-content-i-dont-think-so/#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave - Thanks for the comments about my recent article. I should have been more specific, but was short of time when writing it (I&#039;ll be more careful next time!)

&quot;Sell&quot; content need not be just a transaction-it could be about &#039;selling&#039; an idea, causing someone to do something, etc. For example, the &#039;Sell&#039; content on the website of the UK Labour Party is to get people to vote Labour. The &quot;Sell&quot; content on the website of the World WildLife Fund is to get people to join the organisation (or do something about ecology change). The sell content on Amazon is to get people to buy a book (or a DVD, or a fridge, etc)

The &quot;sell&quot; content on my own site is get people to believe in and act on my ideas. I &quot;persuade&quot; them into that by creating a (hopefully) professional appearance (e.g. about me info, photo, privacy details, good secondary content, nice design, etc). I then reassure them they have done the right thing in trusting me by providing content details if they want to complain/compliment me, and newsletter by which they can stay in touch with changes, (a kind-of after sales service) etc.

A more general example is MySpace. It &#039;persudes&#039; partly through the good testimonials of so many other users. It sells by making is so damn easy to create a new site. It reassures by providing good help and support, and by its efforts to defeat all those nasty guys who use it for fraud and worse. 

UIE had an interesting piece about a similar idea (called Inukshuk content)
on their site earlier last year: https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave &#8211; Thanks for the comments about my recent article. I should have been more specific, but was short of time when writing it (I&#8217;ll be more careful next time!)</p>
<p>&#8220;Sell&#8221; content need not be just a transaction-it could be about &#8217;selling&#8217; an idea, causing someone to do something, etc. For example, the &#8216;Sell&#8217; content on the website of the UK Labour Party is to get people to vote Labour. The &#8220;Sell&#8221; content on the website of the World WildLife Fund is to get people to join the organisation (or do something about ecology change). The sell content on Amazon is to get people to buy a book (or a DVD, or a fridge, etc)</p>
<p>The &#8220;sell&#8221; content on my own site is get people to believe in and act on my ideas. I &#8220;persuade&#8221; them into that by creating a (hopefully) professional appearance (e.g. about me info, photo, privacy details, good secondary content, nice design, etc). I then reassure them they have done the right thing in trusting me by providing content details if they want to complain/compliment me, and newsletter by which they can stay in touch with changes, (a kind-of after sales service) etc.</p>
<p>A more general example is MySpace. It &#8216;persudes&#8217; partly through the good testimonials of so many other users. It sells by making is so damn easy to create a new site. It reassures by providing good help and support, and by its efforts to defeat all those nasty guys who use it for fraud and worse. </p>
<p>UIE had an interesting piece about a similar idea (called Inukshuk content)<br />
on their site earlier last year: <a href="https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/" rel="nofollow">https://www.uie.com/articles/inukshuk_content/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
