Inviting Participation, Part 2: Passive Invitations

Posted on January 5, 2007
Filed Under Digital Space, Library 2.0, Web 2.0 |

This is part 2 of my Inviting Participation in Web 2.0 series of articles.

I thought I’d tackle the more difficult type of invitation first - passive invitations. Going back to the example in my first post on inviting participation, my Are You Blogging This song. Within my blog post about the song, I didn’t directly ask anyone to post anything about the song or to comment about it in my post. But the title of my song DID ask people, very directly, to participate, since it asked the question… are you blogging this? Listeners felt compelled to respond. That’s a good example of a passive invitation to participate.

So what exactly is a passive invitation? I think the word passive could probably be switched out with indirect. With passive invitations, you aren’t directly asking for anything; ie., “hey, can you write back” or “please comment on this post.” Instead, you are inviting participation indirectly - hence, passive invitations.

Passive invitations can come in different forms. The first form involves content:

The second form uses web 2.0 tools to invite participation:

And finally, training. Yes, I think training is a form of passive invitation. Why? Because … you can teach customers about RSS and RSS readers, and instruct them, in class, to subscribe to your library’s blog. And to comment … which means that you have just invited them to participate.

Remember that I asked YOU to participate in this discussion? Well, now is a good time… what am I leaving out? Can you think of other passive, indirect invitations to participate? If so, please leave a comment - we can discuss them right here!

, ,

Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit

Comments

18 Responses to “Inviting Participation, Part 2: Passive Invitations”

  1. Kathryn Greenhill on January 5th, 2007 6:14 am

    How about making your comments all visible in one spot, like on your sidebar? That way people can see that others are playing and that you don’t bite. And your space becomes more closer to looking like it’s their space too.

  2. Kathryn Greenhill on January 5th, 2007 6:17 am

    (Unless they accidentally use a phrase like “more closer”..then they probably wouldn’t want it on public display) :)

  3. davidleeking on January 5th, 2007 8:35 am

    Hee :-) Great idea, though. I’ve seen some blog sites do that to great effect. And you’re right - it’s a great visual way to show that customers are already participating… so why don’t you participate, too?

  4. Kelley on January 6th, 2007 4:10 pm

    Just a response to the training part of it. Staff training too I think is another good way to help in this process. If all the staff, even those that aren’t really computer literate, can understand RSS, blogs, and the like then it’s almost an example to participate. Like saying “Hey, even we can do this. You can too. Let us show you how.”

  5. Brian Gray on January 7th, 2007 12:50 am

    Utilizing the functions of blogging software, such as pings, trackbacks, keywords, categories, etc. It promotes readership by other bloggers or people that utilize the various search resources to streamline the readings. Also, posting on others blogs says “I am interested in what you have to say, have you checked my blog”.

  6. davidleeking on January 7th, 2007 9:40 am

    Kelly - great idea! You’re right - staff training is way to invite passive participation. Same as with library databases, I think. If the library staffer knows about a database, they’ll share with patrons when it’s appropriate, right? And so… if that same staffer knows about rss and the library’s blogs, etc - I think they’ll also share about those at appropriate times, thus “inviting participation.”

  7. davidleeking on January 7th, 2007 9:42 am

    Brian - good point. pings and trackbacks, categories, etc are all blog-specific forms of passive invitations, because they reach out to potential customers. Thanks for mentioning it!

  8. K.G. Schneider on January 7th, 2007 2:40 pm

    My only quibble is with the term “passive invitation.” I agree that “indirect” doesn’t cut it either. Would that I had a term for it… but I completely get your meaning, and agree with your intent. You’re being open and avaiilable to interaction. Welcoming. Whatever.

    I also agree that staff training is crucial. It all begins at home.

  9. David Lee King » Blog Archive » Inviting Participation: Active Invitations on January 10th, 2007 11:37 am

    [...] So far in this series, I’ve introduced the concept of inviting participation, and I’ve covered passive invitations to participation. And some of you have actually been participating in this discussion, too - that’s wonderful! Y’all have great ideas. So keep sharing them! [...]

  10. David Lee King » Blog Archive » Inviting Participation, Part 3: Active Invitations on January 10th, 2007 11:39 am

    [...] So far in this series, I’ve introduced the concept of inviting participation, and I’ve covered passive invitations to participation. And some of you have actually been participating in this discussion, too - that’s wonderful! Y’all have great ideas. So keep sharing them! [...]

  11. David Lee King » Blog Archive » Inviting Participation in Web 2.0 on January 10th, 2007 11:40 am

    [...] etc « DOPA is Dead Inviting Participation, Part 2: Passive Invitations » [...]

  12. Michelle McLean on January 11th, 2007 6:59 am

    Very inspiring stuff and I totally agree with the comments before me. It got me thinking so much that I ended up blogging about it. If only I could work out trackbacks/pings and Blogger supported them.

  13. Information Wants To Be Free » Blog Archive » Encouraging participation in the wiki world on January 14th, 2007 9:48 pm

    [...] Part 2: Passive Invitations [...]

  14. 烂泥巴的园子 » Blog Archive » Inviting Participation on February 25th, 2007 1:25 pm

    [...] Inviting Participation, Part 2: Passive Invitations [...]

  15. Passive Invitation to Communicate « WML Tech Updates on March 2nd, 2007 5:52 pm

    [...] There is so much out there on getting involved, but not as much on how to get involved. This post, Inviting Participation, Part 2: Passive Invitations is simply a wonderful piece on getting involved. I especially like the fact that he includes [...]

  16. e3 Information Overload (E-Resources for Engineering Education) AND Are You 2.0 Yet? on January 20th, 2008 11:31 pm

    Web 2.0 Participation…

    David Lee King has started an interesting series of blog entries about participation in a Web 2.0 environment. After introducing……

  17. Prateek on April 17th, 2008 12:33 pm

    Interesting discussion

    I think one more thing to do (which you have already done on your blog) is to have a follow up comments by email plugin. This makes sure people are engaged in a conversation and they keep coming back to discuss.

    Regards
    Prateek Dayal

  18. david lee king on April 17th, 2008 12:38 pm

    Good point, Prateek. That email comments plugin is a great example of a passive form of inviting participation. Thanks for mentioning it!

Leave a Reply