Comments on: Becoming a Technology Agnostic http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/ David Lee King is the Digital Branch & Services Manager at the Topeka & Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-18828 davidleeking Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:32:52 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-18828 Mat - a "gimmick" that has lasted for over 10 years now. I think there's a little more to it than that. Mat – a “gimmick” that has lasted for over 10 years now. I think there’s a little more to it than that.

]]> By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-25469 davidleeking Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:32:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-25469 Mat - a "gimmick" that has lasted for over 10 years now. I think there's a little more to it than that. Mat – a “gimmick” that has lasted for over 10 years now. I think there’s a little more to it than that.

]]> By: Mat http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-18827 Mat Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:26:47 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-18827 yeah if that you say so...web 2.0 just a gimmick :( Cheers, yeah if that you say so…web 2.0 just a gimmick :(
Cheers,

]]> By: Mat http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-25468 Mat Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:26:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-25468 yeah if that you say so...web 2.0 just a gimmick :( Cheers, yeah if that you say so…web 2.0 just a gimmick :(
Cheers,

]]> By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-6366 davidleeking Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:35:24 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-6366 Walt - you're right. I'd envision it working all ways; not just PC to Mac. Walt – you’re right. I’d envision it working all ways; not just PC to Mac.

]]> By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-25467 davidleeking Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:35:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-25467 Walt - you're right. I'd envision it working all ways; not just PC to Mac. Walt – you’re right. I’d envision it working all ways; not just PC to Mac.

]]> By: Lucas McDonnell http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-6362 Lucas McDonnell Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:06:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-6362 I'm glad you enjoyed the article. When assessing technology solutions, there are certainly too many times where the decision maker has already made a decision about the technology in question -- and isn't really taking an objective look at the business requirements set out by the project's stakeholders. By the way, I really enjoyed your post on making time for 2.0 -- I find 'Web 2.0' is an often misunderstood term, and it's great to see someone putting some context around it for others. I’m glad you enjoyed the article. When assessing technology solutions, there are certainly too many times where the decision maker has already made a decision about the technology in question — and isn’t really taking an objective look at the business requirements set out by the project’s stakeholders.

By the way, I really enjoyed your post on making time for 2.0 — I find ‘Web 2.0′ is an often misunderstood term, and it’s great to see someone putting some context around it for others.

]]> By: Lucas McDonnell http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-25466 Lucas McDonnell Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:06:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-25466 I'm glad you enjoyed the article. When assessing technology solutions, there are certainly too many times where the decision maker has already made a decision about the technology in question -- and isn't really taking an objective look at the business requirements set out by the project's stakeholders. By the way, I really enjoyed your post on making time for 2.0 -- I find 'Web 2.0' is an often misunderstood term, and it's great to see someone putting some context around it for others. I’m glad you enjoyed the article. When assessing technology solutions, there are certainly too many times where the decision maker has already made a decision about the technology in question — and isn’t really taking an objective look at the business requirements set out by the project’s stakeholders.

By the way, I really enjoyed your post on making time for 2.0 — I find ‘Web 2.0′ is an often misunderstood term, and it’s great to see someone putting some context around it for others.

]]> By: walt crawford http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-6360 walt crawford Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:45:04 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-6360 This sounds very good. And I assume that it doesn't just work one way: That groups wedded to Macs or Linux should consider the possibility that, under some circumstances, MS might offer the best solution. This sounds very good. And I assume that it doesn’t just work one way: That groups wedded to Macs or Linux should consider the possibility that, under some circumstances, MS might offer the best solution.

]]> By: walt crawford http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-25465 walt crawford Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:45:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/03/21/becoming-a-technology-agnostic/#comment-25465 This sounds very good. And I assume that it doesn't just work one way: That groups wedded to Macs or Linux should consider the possibility that, under some circumstances, MS might offer the best solution. This sounds very good. And I assume that it doesn’t just work one way: That groups wedded to Macs or Linux should consider the possibility that, under some circumstances, MS might offer the best solution.

]]>