http://www.davidleeking.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_16

Copyright vs Creative Commons on Library Websites

by David Lee King on June 16, 2007

I was just looking at Nashville Public Library’s website – very attractive site! They redesigned last year, and now have a great website, full of web 2.0-ish goodness.

And then I saw this in their footer: “Copyright © 2006 Nashville Public
Library, All Rights Reserved.” I don’t have a beef with NPL – the same type of thing can be found on my website and many others, too.

But I do have a question: is this really necessary? Copyright is generally placed on a website to say “ask before you use the stuff found on this website.” So why not go the extra mile and use a Creative Commons license?  That way, instead of having a sign on your website that says stop!, you’ll have a sign that says “feel free to re-use our content – we wrote it for you, after all! Just let us know about it!”

It’s a small way to encourage your customers to start conversations – remember my Inviting Participation mantra?

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

  • Yes, a Kansas 2.0 conference WOULD be cool! If you're serious, I'd bet NEKLS would help... and we could probably set up a meeting at TSCPL, too...

    Hmm... the possibilities!
  • Agreed. Why not the phrase:

    "If it is ours: take it. If it belongs to someone else: ask."

    Copyright is one of those topics that I would bet most people know nothing about, except for the "if i put it in the mail its copyrighted" myth. In which case, they still don't know anything about copyright.

    On another note: Wouldn't a Kansas 2.0 conference be cool?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: