<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright vs Creative Commons on Library Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/</link>
	<description>David Lee King is the Digital Branch &#38; Services Manager at the Topeka &#38; Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david lee king</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-7781</link>
		<dc:creator>david lee king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/#comment-7781</guid>
		<description>Yes, a Kansas 2.0 conference WOULD be cool! If you&#039;re serious, I&#039;d bet NEKLS would help... and we could probably set up a meeting at TSCPL, too...

Hmm... the possibilities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a Kansas 2.0 conference WOULD be cool! If you&#8217;re serious, I&#8217;d bet NEKLS would help&#8230; and we could probably set up a meeting at TSCPL, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; the possibilities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david lee king</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-25637</link>
		<dc:creator>david lee king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/#comment-25637</guid>
		<description>Yes, a Kansas 2.0 conference WOULD be cool! If you&#039;re serious, I&#039;d bet NEKLS would help... and we could probably set up a meeting at TSCPL, too...

Hmm... the possibilities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a Kansas 2.0 conference WOULD be cool! If you&#8217;re serious, I&#8217;d bet NEKLS would help&#8230; and we could probably set up a meeting at TSCPL, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; the possibilities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royce</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-7780</link>
		<dc:creator>royce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/#comment-7780</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Why not the phrase:

&quot;If it is ours: take it. If it belongs to someone else: ask.&quot;

Copyright is one of those topics that I would bet most people know nothing about, except for the &quot;if i put it in the mail its copyrighted&quot; myth. In which case, they still don&#039;t know anything about copyright.

On another note: Wouldn&#039;t a Kansas 2.0 conference be cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Why not the phrase:</p>
<p>&#8220;If it is ours: take it. If it belongs to someone else: ask.&#8221;</p>
<p>Copyright is one of those topics that I would bet most people know nothing about, except for the &#8220;if i put it in the mail its copyrighted&#8221; myth. In which case, they still don&#8217;t know anything about copyright.</p>
<p>On another note: Wouldn&#8217;t a Kansas 2.0 conference be cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royce</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-25636</link>
		<dc:creator>royce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/06/16/copyright-vs-creative-commons-on-library-websites/#comment-25636</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Why not the phrase:

&quot;If it is ours: take it. If it belongs to someone else: ask.&quot;

Copyright is one of those topics that I would bet most people know nothing about, except for the &quot;if i put it in the mail its copyrighted&quot; myth. In which case, they still don&#039;t know anything about copyright.

On another note: Wouldn&#039;t a Kansas 2.0 conference be cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Why not the phrase:</p>
<p>&#8220;If it is ours: take it. If it belongs to someone else: ask.&#8221;</p>
<p>Copyright is one of those topics that I would bet most people know nothing about, except for the &#8220;if i put it in the mail its copyrighted&#8221; myth. In which case, they still don&#8217;t know anything about copyright.</p>
<p>On another note: Wouldn&#8217;t a Kansas 2.0 conference be cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

