March 2008

Speakers: George Needham and Joan Frye Williams

Aside – if you’ve never heard them speak, you need to. They are great presenters, and have great things to say. The combination is awesome!

Aside – George pulled up iTunes before the presentation and is playing some cool blues as background music. What a cool way to add a certain feel to a room!

Joan started by reviewing the “presentation policies” – spoofing all the rules that libraries have

“Legacy Librarianship” describes the fundamental truths learned in library school, handed down through the generations.

Some of our basic assumptions of librarianship need to change – recent studies have shown that!

Assumption: libraries are the go-to place form information

Reality:
- libraries don’t rank high – search engines 82%, libraries 1%
- Another study asked a similar question – libraries 1% (from a study done in 1947!!!)

We need to design for open use – not in-library use
- mainstream data formats
- easy import/export/snip
- toolbars, gadgets, APIs
- institutional and civilian-defined tags
- mashup was a graphic on the slide, and a great example

enhanced discoverability
- engines, not opacs
- crawl-able databases
- text/IM/microformats
- digitization
- captioning
- contributions to non-library sites and sources

We cannot offer a service if you have to find us to use it

More important to post good info on other blogs rather than your own (people clapped! I’m wondering if those people understood her point)

Assumption: libraries aren’t just about books anymore

reality: people think we’re about books
- this is not a bad thing – that’s great brand recognition
Why do people use the library? Studies show it’s mainly books…

If we have a brand, let’s use it.

Talk about reading, learning and enjoying. We aren’t in the information business – we are in the ideas business. We need to be in the ideas economy.

Push the books/reading lifestyle
- Success through reading
- sociable reading
- artistry of books
- write it yourself
- reading to maintain your brain
- books as ties to popular culture/books

“Civilian” – anybody that doesn’t have library training

Emphasis on abundance:
- focus on assets, not deficiencies
- demand-based resource allocation – if you need more best-sellers, you need to buy more.
- fast, convenient service delivery – spend more time and money on delivery tools
- minimal rationing – Libraries usually do this – “the more you want it, the less you can have it.” -Don’t do that!
- appreciative inquiry
- no victims

Assumption: patrons aren’t capable of finding good things on their own

Reality: time is scarce, not information

The world is changing. Ex – we do stuff ourselves now instead of using specialists (ie., Expedia or Travelocity vs travel agents).

Who provides worthwhile information? Libraries don’t rank high among civilians.

Comparing libraries to search engines – SEs win in categories like easy to use, convenient, fast, reliable…

Why? People think there’s no difference between the trustworthiness of libraries and the trustworthiness of search engines.

What to do:
- make the library very different than it is now
- we like it that users need help – that’s a bad thing! We should knock down those barriers
- we need to simplify everything!
- less clutter, civilian terminology, situational directions, power paths & nodes, layout by activity, not collection
- this is true in both online and physical libraries

Use civilian words!!!
- focus on situational terms
- Pay here, ask, get
- circulation or fines doesn’t tell civilians anything situational

Arrange the library by what people do there
- Do Your homework
- ask a question
- read new stuff

Zone staffing
- service points are wrong
- not just on desk – you’re responsible for a whole area.
- you’re responsible for the civlian’s successful experience – not just for specific transactions

Success insurance
- information at the point of use
- minimal gate-keeping
- fewer simpler rules
- presumption of innocence

the real world is training people
- ex: if customers already know how to get in line at starbucks or the grocery store, use that experience

“I have a really dumb question”
- this means your library just made me feel stupid
- is that really the experience you want to leave your customers with?

Assumption: one-on-one service is our most valuable product

Reality: comparing librarians to search engines: no difference

how can we highlight and reinforce librarians status as professionals?

Great idea: dispatched service
- no other profession puts their professionals at a single point (desk)
- librarians should not be the first point of contact
- centrally located desk:
– staffed by non librarian dispatcher
– matches questions to the best person to handle it
- librarians work on call
- tech staff work on call
- work to completion with each person

Don’t call it reference librarian – call it researcher (aside – I’m thinking of the Apple Store’s Mac Genius)

Redeployed reference – if they aren’t sitting at the desk, what are they doing?
- creating prepackaged information, FAQs
- research
- check your work
- appointments
- learning specialists (instead of subject specialists)
- constituent specialists
– someone focused on certain community groups
– understanding what makes them tick
– and working to meet their needs
- outreach – out in the community!

Aside – OMG – this is the missing link for the digital branch! More time for librarians to write, present, do FAQs, etc…

Upselling
- this is what store clerks do when you’re looking at pants, ie., “this belt would go great with those pants”
- for staff in the stacks:
– Not just “here’s the cookbooks”
– but here’s the cookbooks, and we have a cooking program today”

Assumption: civilians recognize and value library confidentiality

Reality
- not so much.
- many people have given up on the idea of privacy
- we don’t use the data we have to improve our own services!

How can we use the data we already collect?
- real-time activities buzz
– show live circulation activity ex.: yorba linda pl book feed – here’s what people are turning back into the library – it’s a web feed widget thing on the websites…??? it’s the most popular thing on their site

live program excerpts
- use video
- show people what’s happening in programs (2 minute thing)

Push stuff!
- new titles – 800 new books this week!

wireless strength – tell people which rooms have the best wifi!

parking cam! We could do that!

These are ways to show the buzz already happening at your library, and to bump the buzz up a notch.

Evidence-based planning and marketing
- design for most common situations
- community segments/profiles
- reports framed to match stakeholder (civilian) agendas
- collaboration based on audiences shared with non-library partners

Assumption: we need to educate these people

Reality – we need to provide what they want
- how can we contribute to civilians quality of life, work, and learning – on their terms
- how can we be part of their story?
- it is not our job to straighten these people out!

Don’t try to get people to care about libraries. Show them how the library helps them care about their stuff.

Technorati Tags: , ,

7 comments

Sarah Cofer, Barbara Pitney, Kristen Becker

What do they blog about?

  • they use the blog as their outreach
  • “we totally blog about it” – mp3 player services, tutor stuff, etc
  • teens like personal connections – they promote their services, but they also talk about themselves – ex – librarian dyed her hair purple, and she blogged about it
  • trying to bridge online experiences with personal experiences

It’s ok for a new service to fail – it didn’t really fail, because you learned something.

Why aren’t teens commenting on my blog?

Teens want to be friends with people they trust – not with institutions. Speaker’s personal myspace page has become her professional page.

Be the first to comment

Michael Stephens, John Blyberg and Jen Maney

Jen’s title: Let’s Get Excited (and realistic) about Web 2.0

“not really a technological phenomenon at all; it’s a social one, enabled by technology.”

Can’t understand new tools in the abstract – you have to use them.

They have an emerging technologies team – they help evaluate services and new stuff

They think of 2.0 stuff as outreach outside of the library

Pima County Public Library has 4.5 web staff: Designer, programmer, electronic resources, head (and a part timer)

2.0 site is moving toward a conversation

Michael Stephens is next:

Title: Scary things & Great Opportunities: Web 2.0 & Libraries 2008

Best thing – remember to say “yes”

Look for “Library as place” on youtube – trying to find books at Chicago Public Library – they video’d the experience, including getting kicked out of the library by security.

Aside – Check out Nashville Public Library’s social stuff

“Please bring your heart with you to work.”

Three important things:
1. Don’t stop learning
2. adapt to change
3. watch the horizon

John Blyberg spoke last:

Title: Keen on 2.0: The Amateurs are Coming!

Going to talk about the naysayers of 2.0

Keen thinks 2.0 is dangerous much like communism! What’s up with that?

Blyberg is pointing out specific quotes/thoughts from Keen’s writings, and poking large holes in them

Example – Keen doesn’t think the long tail really exists. Hmm…

Andrew Keen’s writings is what happens when we succum to fear.

2 comments

PLA 2008 Day 1: Dewey or Don’t We?

by David Lee King on March 28, 2008

Maricopa County Library District Perry Branch dumped Dewey

Marshall Shore was one of the speakers (there were two others from his library as well)

Customers wanted a comfortable, browsable space – they thought of the concept of third space, and merchandising type stuff

signage – looked good 2 feet away, completely unreadable at 30 feet away

all the staff do staff picks, then display it

shelves on wheels – so you have a flexible space

Extremely large labels on walls -3′ letters!

No reference – everything circulates!!! That’s cool. And the second time I’ve heard that today.

Used the bookstore BISAC system – they simplified and customized that

Customers – 95% satisfied (via a survey)

staff – 100% satisfied!

3 comments

Speaker: Michelle Jeske

Why – make connections with a new audience.

Sunnyvale public library podcasts – audio and video broadcasts… cool! Nice looking site – blog-based

Charlotte and Mecklenberg example – LibraryLoft author presentation

NYPL example (they’re really been transforming lately – fun to watch)

Denver Public Library
- Stories for Kids podcasts
- teen tech week – podcasts created by teens – they let teens use library equipment
- children making stop motion animation
- Summer of Reading video – fun!
- doing screencasting, too

Boulder Public Library teen webcasts – looks like they’re using Gcast

KCPL Bluford Branch podcasts in Myspace and Internet Archive

Edmonton Public Library’s YouTube channel – lots of puppet shows

Allen County Public Library’s zombie video

Seattle Public has some tutorials on youtube!!!

DPL – created a podcasting studio in a closet, added foam and burlap, etc.

National Poetry Month – one a day from staff

Cell phone video contest – they want to do this

YouTube Channel – working on that and a Facebook page

Want to feature local artists and bands

They have some staff that have “a following” – they’re wanting to get those staff to do more audio/video so they can continue to develop that presence online

3 comments

Speakers: Paula Alston, Sean O’Connell, Jody Treadway

Common mistakes:
- a warm body to fill the vacant position
- if you have reservations, don’t hire that person

warning danger avoid
- the whinny candidate
- the helpless candidate
- the candidate who has to be talked into taking the job
- the candidate who has conditions on taking the job
- the candidate who doesn’t commit to pre-employment deadlines

References
most important – would you hire this person again?

Really use the probationary period

Application – if they are careless on the application, they might be careless in their job

Interview questions – answer those yourself beforehand, then during interview, you can more accurately look for answers you want

Most people will fire themselves – they’ll either do something they know will get them fired, or they’ll resign. How odd!

Technorati Tags: , ,

9 comments

Speaker: Joseph Janes

Title: What Does it Take to be Good at Reference in the Age of Google?

Aside – Sorta humorous – moderator asked us to turn off our cell phones… in THIS session about emerging trends in the age of google! Hee. Probably should have said “put cell phones on mute.”

“we can find things they can’t find” – this is a revelation to many people.

we shouldn’t emphasize ready reference anymore – Google is the rough equivalent of ready reference, and we can’t compete with it.

We can do better than that – we don’t have to answer the dumb questions anymore!

Google does great at orientation

Google is free, quick, easy, and good enough – we can’t beat that!

What Google cannot do:
- not good at gathering – Google does great at finding, but not gathering…
- google doesn’t evaluate, decide, understand, help
- google doesn’t do print (yet)
- doesn’t do fee-based stuff
- google doesn’t have highly sophisticated search (lexis-nexis, etc)
- not part of the community

How to be a good reference librarian in the age of google?
- be a reference librarian
- just not the same one you would have been 10 years ago
- do a good interview – regardless of mode (in person, phone, email, chat, IM, text message, etc)

Know the tricks:
- be more effective searchers
- know all the tricks, advanced features, etc
- know alternatives, when to use it and not to use it

articulate our strengths – we don’t do a good job of that!

(aside – Joe works a couple hours at the desk at the library – that’s cool! My library profs hadn’t worked in libraries for years)

Build tools that help people without direct intervention
- research guides (Cornell vodcasting Research Minutes on YouTube – how to use the library in 90 seconds or less – I need to check these out!)
- use easily understood names for services, tools, etc…
- citation = traffic ticket
- catalog = comes from LandsEnd

Position ourselves and our services as time-savers
- google’s fast, but we can save you time! average time spent searching in Google is 11 minutes! Wow! We are obviously faster than that!
- why search when we can help you find?

Be where they are
- we must be available, positioned, and ready to support, assist, and participate – on their terms

good point – when people ask us questions, it’s because they already tried and failed…

people ask shelvers questions – why? Because they’re there…

what to do:
we can’t beat them on quick, fast, easy, and cheap – we can fight them on quality, depth, education, instruction, literacy, etc
- play on our strengths
- and how they fit in the emerging world

What about print?
- in the short run, it’s a secret weapon – not everyone has access to print!
- they are unique
- in the longer run, they will be slowly decreasing in importance

wikipedia – if you don’t like it, get over it!
- instead of whining about it… do something about it!
- if you don’t vote, don’t complain
- create and edit entries, cite sources, fight for quality, be a positive force (a la learning 2.0)

YouTube
- search for libraries – even funnier – search for “libary”
- make a video!

blogosphere
- have your own, yes, but also participate in community/others

Read blogs of people in your community – and participate by commenting!

Second Life
- it’s a new way to create
- it’s a way to get into the ground floor of a whole new way of creating

Most important – Work Together.

the idea of library has escaped the building
it’s now an extended notion of library – anywhere, anytime, any way in which people interact with information organized, provided, supported by their own community via their library staff.

“We have to be even better online than in person”

Technorati Tags: , ,

21 comments

by David Lee King on March 25, 2008


Mobile post sent by davidleeking using Utterz Replies.  mp3

4 comments

Above and Beyond Customer Service

by David Lee King on March 25, 2008

Director's desk and patronsSomething cool happened in my library a couple days ago. Take a peek at this picture, and let me explain the scene:

This elderly couple (you can’t see him, but there’s a man sitting down in the pic with the woman) came to the library with a specific task in mind – to look at some old slides from the 50′s and 60′s that had been turned into digital photos on a CD. The couple doesn’t own a PC, so they naturally thought “I’ll go to the library.”

Walking into our main doors, they met Gina, our library director, who was taking her turn at our Greeter Desk (we have a “grand rotunda” that looks amazing. It’s also a directional challenge, so we’ve been placing staff in the rotunda and calling it our Greeter Desk). They explained the problem, she said “sure, we can help,” then looked at me (I was chatting with her). I had the unfortunate task of reminding her that we don’t have CD drives in our public PCs (it’s an inherited problem – hopefully changing it soon!).

Gina gave it some thought for like 5 seconds, then asked me to take this fine couple up to her office to view their pictures. Yes, you heard that right – on a staff PC, in the Director’s office.

When they were done, I walked back to Gina. She looked at me, pointed a finger at me, and said “that’s 2.0, David.”

And I’d agree. No, it’s not really about technology. It’s not about using RSS feeds. But it DOES display the type of above-and-beyond customer focus that my library is developing. For us, that’s a 2.0 change for the better.

And… if you like that story and want to hear more from Gina, well… you’re in luck (that is, if you’re headed to Computers in Libraries). She and I will be giving the last presentation of the day in the Innovation and Change track on April 8. Here’s more about our session:

Title: Leading Technology in Libraries: Making Time for Web 2.0

Description: Millsap explores the digital divide between administration and staff and looks at how leadership is the key and technology the tool. She shares strategies for leading with technology, not in spite of it. King focuses on why libraries need to make time for Web 2.0; why they need to learn about and experiment with new tools; allowing staff the time needed to play with these tools; making time for Web 2.0; and facing change.

Stop by and say hi!

24 comments

Library Camp Kansas 2008: Final Session

by David Lee King on March 19, 2008

We came back together at the end of the day to share… here’s what I heard:

hearing each other’s idea talk

sharing between public and academics

felt like they had to choose…

Had a wonderful experience hearing what academics are doing… “they are so way out there… compared to a little public library”

More timely topics at this unconference because of the spontanaity of topics/discussions

This was the conversation you usually have outside of conference sessions

Liked the idea of going to lunch, talking about a topic – don’t usually have this at a conference

Networking and continuing the dialog is important

What next?
We have the wiki – add the notes to those sessions, add to those discussions
have a contact page up of people who attended (we have that already)

It would be nice to go a little more in depth in a topic and come away with some take-home points to try out at your library

Maybe have someone do a 5 minute intro on a topic

Michael Sauers mentioned Nebraska is planning a similar unconference thing

Technorati Tags:

Be the first to comment