<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peer Review, Journal Articles, and Blogs &#8211; an Example</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/</link>
	<description>David Lee King is the Digital Branch &#38; Services Manager at the Topeka &#38; Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-24654</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-24654</guid>
		<description>The post is extremely good which is posted by David Lee King. The discussion about peer review/journal article/blog thing is good &lt;a href=&quot;http://onlineslots-realmoney.com&quot;&gt;play slot machines
&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is extremely good which is posted by David Lee King. The discussion about peer review/journal article/blog thing is good <a href="http://onlineslots-realmoney.com">play slot machines<br />
</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live casino UK</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-24655</link>
		<dc:creator>live casino UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-24655</guid>
		<description>The discussion for peer review/journal article/blogs are the good thing to made it. Michel thought is good one. Sarah, Marcus and Michael can think to do best.Thanks for this post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livecasinoplay.co.uk/&quot;&gt;live casino UK&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discussion for peer review/journal article/blogs are the good thing to made it. Michel thought is good one. Sarah, Marcus and Michael can think to do best.Thanks for this post <a href="http://www.livecasinoplay.co.uk/">live casino UK</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: learnhowtoplaypoker</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-23799</link>
		<dc:creator>learnhowtoplaypoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-23799</guid>
		<description>The concept of discussing the peer review,journal article,blog is a good news. I am also thinks the same. Mr.Michael thought is good one. I had also seen the old article about peer preview.Its a great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of discussing the peer review,journal article,blog is a good news. I am also thinks the same. Mr.Michael thought is good one. I had also seen the old article about peer preview.Its a great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Siess</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-23580</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Siess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-23580</guid>
		<description>I DEFINITELY feel that electronic publishing, with comments, is better than print--IF it can be archived somehow.&lt;br&gt;Why couldn&#039;t someone write an article and post it on a special blog or wiki, have several selected peers review it (selected by the owner of the blog or wiki, not the author, of course), then publish it with changes--AND the comments if possible. Then others could comment on it.&lt;br&gt;If there were a mechanism to control this, it could be much better than the current long, drawn-out, review process for print journals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does this correspond to how online journals work? For instance, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice? (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIPhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/...&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this is something that is of interest to more than academics. If the process were easier and faster, perhaps more practitioners would contribute refereed articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I DEFINITELY feel that electronic publishing, with comments, is better than print&#8211;IF it can be archived somehow.<br />Why couldn&#39;t someone write an article and post it on a special blog or wiki, have several selected peers review it (selected by the owner of the blog or wiki, not the author, of course), then publish it with changes&#8211;AND the comments if possible. Then others could comment on it.<br />If there were a mechanism to control this, it could be much better than the current long, drawn-out, review process for print journals.</p>
<p>How does this correspond to how online journals work? For instance, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice? (<a href="http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIPhttp://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP" rel="nofollow">http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/&#8230;</a>).</p>
<p>I think this is something that is of interest to more than academics. If the process were easier and faster, perhaps more practitioners would contribute refereed articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Eeyore Librarian</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-19275</link>
		<dc:creator>The Eeyore Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-19275</guid>
		<description>Gave this article some link love over &lt;a href=&quot;http://eeyorelibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/zombie-pinups-and-open-access.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here &lt;/a&gt;

Thanks for the great conversation starter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gave this article some link love over <a href="http://eeyorelibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/zombie-pinups-and-open-access.html" rel="nofollow"> here </a></p>
<p>Thanks for the great conversation starter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Eeyore Librarian</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-26321</link>
		<dc:creator>The Eeyore Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-26321</guid>
		<description>Gave this article some link love over &lt;a href=&quot;http://eeyorelibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/zombie-pinups-and-open-access.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here &lt;/a&gt;

Thanks for the great conversation starter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gave this article some link love over <a href="http://eeyorelibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/zombie-pinups-and-open-access.html" rel="nofollow"> here </a></p>
<p>Thanks for the great conversation starter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-18773</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-18773</guid>
		<description>Helene - agreed. And for me, in the librarian, tech, emerging trends field, journals simply don&#039;t cut it. 

It&#039;s possible my focus is different. I&#039;m not interested in &quot;consulting the literature&quot; - I&#039;m more interesting in making our digital services work better. I&#039;m trying to think of the last time I actually DID do a librarian lit search... and coming up empty! Probably about 3 years ago when I was looking for info on a work-related project.

Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helene &#8211; agreed. And for me, in the librarian, tech, emerging trends field, journals simply don&#8217;t cut it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible my focus is different. I&#8217;m not interested in &#8220;consulting the literature&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m more interesting in making our digital services work better. I&#8217;m trying to think of the last time I actually DID do a librarian lit search&#8230; and coming up empty! Probably about 3 years ago when I was looking for info on a work-related project.</p>
<p>Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-26320</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-26320</guid>
		<description>Helene - agreed. And for me, in the librarian, tech, emerging trends field, journals simply don&#039;t cut it. 

It&#039;s possible my focus is different. I&#039;m not interested in &quot;consulting the literature&quot; - I&#039;m more interesting in making our digital services work better. I&#039;m trying to think of the last time I actually DID do a librarian lit search... and coming up empty! Probably about 3 years ago when I was looking for info on a work-related project.

Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helene &#8211; agreed. And for me, in the librarian, tech, emerging trends field, journals simply don&#8217;t cut it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible my focus is different. I&#8217;m not interested in &#8220;consulting the literature&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m more interesting in making our digital services work better. I&#8217;m trying to think of the last time I actually DID do a librarian lit search&#8230; and coming up empty! Probably about 3 years ago when I was looking for info on a work-related project.</p>
<p>Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-18772</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-18772</guid>
		<description>Rachel - good point. It works for me because people already read my blog. I DO, however, think that good librarian blogs tend to float to the surface - those people writing good stuff tend to get noticed, either by thoughtful comments / contributions they leave on a blog, or through other means (ie., google alerts saved searches, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel &#8211; good point. It works for me because people already read my blog. I DO, however, think that good librarian blogs tend to float to the surface &#8211; those people writing good stuff tend to get noticed, either by thoughtful comments / contributions they leave on a blog, or through other means (ie., google alerts saved searches, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2008/05/22/peer-review-journal-articles-and-blogs-an-example/comment-page-1/#comment-26319</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=690#comment-26319</guid>
		<description>Rachel - good point. It works for me because people already read my blog. I DO, however, think that good librarian blogs tend to float to the surface - those people writing good stuff tend to get noticed, either by thoughtful comments / contributions they leave on a blog, or through other means (ie., google alerts saved searches, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel &#8211; good point. It works for me because people already read my blog. I DO, however, think that good librarian blogs tend to float to the surface &#8211; those people writing good stuff tend to get noticed, either by thoughtful comments / contributions they leave on a blog, or through other means (ie., google alerts saved searches, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

