<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Branch Style Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/</link>
	<description>David Lee King is the Digital Branch &#38; Services Manager at the Topeka &#38; Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: air max shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-27429</link>
		<dc:creator>air max shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-27429</guid>
		<description>nikeshoes2u storeThe Air Jordan 1 shoes was released in 1985 kicking off not only the greatest legacy in sneakers, but also the greatest legacy in basketball history. Wearing the Air Jordan 1, Michael Jordan soared in his rookie year. In 2001, Nike tried a second round with retroing and the Air Jordan 1 was much more successful. The Air Jordan 1 was retroed in 14 total colorways from 2001-2003. The Air Jordan Shoes 1 is a legendary shoe and is the holy grail of most sneaker collectors because of its history and since it was the first Jordan shoes launched.http://www.nikeshoes2u.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nikeshoes2u storeThe Air Jordan 1 shoes was released in 1985 kicking off not only the greatest legacy in sneakers, but also the greatest legacy in basketball history. Wearing the Air Jordan 1, Michael Jordan soared in his rookie year. In 2001, Nike tried a second round with retroing and the Air Jordan 1 was much more successful. The Air Jordan 1 was retroed in 14 total colorways from 2001-2003. The Air Jordan Shoes 1 is a legendary shoe and is the holy grail of most sneaker collectors because of its history and since it was the first Jordan shoes launched.<a href="http://www.nikeshoes2u.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikeshoes2u.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-24567</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-24567</guid>
		<description>Just a follow-up a year or more later - check this out: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-guidelines/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-...&lt;/a&gt; - The AP now agrees - &quot;website&quot; is spelled &quot;website.&quot; Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a follow-up a year or more later &#8211; check this out: <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-guidelines/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-&#8230;</a> &#8211; The AP now agrees &#8211; &#8220;website&#8221; is spelled &#8220;website.&#8221; Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-24325</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-24325</guid>
		<description>Just a follow-up a year or more later - check this out: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-guidelines/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-...&lt;/a&gt; - The AP now agrees - &quot;website&quot; is spelled &quot;website.&quot; Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a follow-up a year or more later &#8211; check this out: <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-guidelines/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2010/06/02/ap-social-media-&#8230;</a> &#8211; The AP now agrees &#8211; &#8220;website&#8221; is spelled &#8220;website.&#8221; Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Timmerman</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Timmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>David: Thanks for this - lots of really great information, and we&#039;re going to use these ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: Thanks for this &#8211; lots of really great information, and we&#39;re going to use these ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Training. It&#8217;s what I do. &#171; Sheaux.us</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-23001</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Training. It&#8217;s what I do. &#171; Sheaux.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-23001</guid>
		<description>[...] library digital branch style guide. http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] library digital branch style guide. <a href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luvgardenias</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-22737</link>
		<dc:creator>luvgardenias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-22737</guid>
		<description>Big LOL for the &quot;my way is the right way&quot; exchange.  Love the style guide and will suggest it as a model for our library.  Greatly appreciate all that you share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big LOL for the &#8220;my way is the right way&#8221; exchange.  Love the style guide and will suggest it as a model for our library.  Greatly appreciate all that you share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luvgardenias</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-26761</link>
		<dc:creator>luvgardenias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-26761</guid>
		<description>Big LOL for the &quot;my way is the right way&quot; exchange.  Love the style guide and will suggest it as a model for our library.  Greatly appreciate all that you share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big LOL for the &#8220;my way is the right way&#8221; exchange.  Love the style guide and will suggest it as a model for our library.  Greatly appreciate all that you share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-20505</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-20505</guid>
		<description>One thing more - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefictiondesk.com/spelling-email-vs-e-mail/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an introductory article&lt;/a&gt; on why I use &quot;email&quot; rather than &quot;E-mail.&quot;

Joe, you should ignore the slug in that link/link title, though :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing more &#8211; <a href="http://www.thefictiondesk.com/spelling-email-vs-e-mail/" rel="nofollow">an introductory article</a> on why I use &#8220;email&#8221; rather than &#8220;E-mail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Joe, you should ignore the slug in that link/link title, though <img src='http://www.davidleeking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-26760</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-26760</guid>
		<description>One thing more - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefictiondesk.com/spelling-email-vs-e-mail/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an introductory article&lt;/a&gt; on why I use &quot;email&quot; rather than &quot;E-mail.&quot;

Joe, you should ignore the slug in that link/link title, though :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing more &#8211; <a href="http://www.thefictiondesk.com/spelling-email-vs-e-mail/" rel="nofollow">an introductory article</a> on why I use &#8220;email&#8221; rather than &#8220;E-mail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Joe, you should ignore the slug in that link/link title, though <img src='http://www.davidleeking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidleeking</title>
		<link>http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/10/digital-branch-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-20504</link>
		<dc:creator>davidleeking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=953#comment-20504</guid>
		<description>Joe - you said &quot;can you explain how the intended audience for your posting – librarians new to blogging – will in fact be using a CMS and not an off-the-shelf blog platform like Movable Type, WordPress, or Blogger?&quot; 

I would imagine they&#039;d use it in any number of ways??? Not really sure what you mean there. And that wasn&#039;t really &quot;the intended audience&quot; either - one of them, yes - but certainly not limited to that.

&quot;you don’t have a case for collapsing E- to e in every case, because the resulting compounds become incomprehensible&quot; - To you, maybe so. A 2-minute cursory search in a modern dictionary shows that &quot;email&quot; is, in fact, an alternative use for E-mail. Your argument isn&#039;t with me - it&#039;s with the dictionary writers. Have fun with that.

But more to the point - removing those hyphens is an emerging use of the term, whether or not you like it. And I prefer the new way.

&quot;I see you have learned exactly nothing about slugs&quot; - I could care less about slugs. I realize I DO have that option, but I choose to not do it. If you have a problem with my non-use of slugs, I suggest you get over it or move on, because I&#039;m not changing it any time soon.

&quot;Tell me: How is that actually better, in any respect, than the following? http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/18/itinerary09/&quot; Well - I would never use the word &quot;itinerary,&quot; for starters, so in my book what I did on my personal website is in every respect better than your suggestion. My blog, my way.

&quot;Some of us have been around longer and know more&quot; Um... I&#039;ve been successfully making and managing websites since 1995, and messing around with gopher before that. How long have you been doing it? Or did you mean your general age?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8211; you said &#8220;can you explain how the intended audience for your posting – librarians new to blogging – will in fact be using a CMS and not an off-the-shelf blog platform like Movable Type, WordPress, or Blogger?&#8221; </p>
<p>I would imagine they&#8217;d use it in any number of ways??? Not really sure what you mean there. And that wasn&#8217;t really &#8220;the intended audience&#8221; either &#8211; one of them, yes &#8211; but certainly not limited to that.</p>
<p>&#8220;you don’t have a case for collapsing E- to e in every case, because the resulting compounds become incomprehensible&#8221; &#8211; To you, maybe so. A 2-minute cursory search in a modern dictionary shows that &#8220;email&#8221; is, in fact, an alternative use for E-mail. Your argument isn&#8217;t with me &#8211; it&#8217;s with the dictionary writers. Have fun with that.</p>
<p>But more to the point &#8211; removing those hyphens is an emerging use of the term, whether or not you like it. And I prefer the new way.</p>
<p>&#8220;I see you have learned exactly nothing about slugs&#8221; &#8211; I could care less about slugs. I realize I DO have that option, but I choose to not do it. If you have a problem with my non-use of slugs, I suggest you get over it or move on, because I&#8217;m not changing it any time soon.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tell me: How is that actually better, in any respect, than the following? <a href="http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/18/itinerary09/" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/02/18/itinerary09/</a>&#8221; Well &#8211; I would never use the word &#8220;itinerary,&#8221; for starters, so in my book what I did on my personal website is in every respect better than your suggestion. My blog, my way.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some of us have been around longer and know more&#8221; Um&#8230; I&#8217;ve been successfully making and managing websites since 1995, and messing around with gopher before that. How long have you been doing it? Or did you mean your general age?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

