Comments on: CIL2009: Evaluating, Recommending & Justifying 2.0 Tools http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/03/31/cil2009-evaluating-recommending-justifying-20-tools/ David Lee King is the Digital Branch & Services Manager at the Topeka & Shawnee County Public Library, where he plans, implements, and experiments with emerging technology trends. He has spoken in the U.S. and Canada about emerging trends, website usability and management, digital experience planning, and managing techie staff, and has been published in many library-related journals. David writes the Internet Spotlight column in Public Libraries Magazine with Michael Porter. David maintains a blog at http://www.davidleeking.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: MIchael Zimmer http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/03/31/cil2009-evaluating-recommending-justifying-20-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-23611 MIchael Zimmer Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:55:34 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=1076#comment-23611 Hello David, I've been following your blog for some time and appreciate you posting notes from CIL.<br><br>Wondering if you could expand on this bullet point:<br>"invasion of privacy - not an issue…"<br><br>What was the argument suggesting that privacy is not an issue wrt Library 2.0?<br><br>Thanks,<br>michael zimmer Hello David, I've been following your blog for some time and appreciate you posting notes from CIL.

Wondering if you could expand on this bullet point:
“invasion of privacy – not an issue…”

What was the argument suggesting that privacy is not an issue wrt Library 2.0?

Thanks,
michael zimmer

]]> By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/03/31/cil2009-evaluating-recommending-justifying-20-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-21081 davidleeking Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:07:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=1076#comment-21081 Michael - sure. She was talking about reality - really, opening this stuff up is, by default, collaborative - so there IS no privacy. Also, you have a choice - you can make it internal/password protected, so there's no issue. You can lock it down to certain people/groups.. etc. Hope that helps explain it further! Michael – sure. She was talking about reality – really, opening this stuff up is, by default, collaborative – so there IS no privacy. Also, you have a choice – you can make it internal/password protected, so there’s no issue. You can lock it down to certain people/groups.. etc.

Hope that helps explain it further!

]]> By: davidleeking http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/03/31/cil2009-evaluating-recommending-justifying-20-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-26874 davidleeking Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:07:00 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=1076#comment-26874 Michael - sure. She was talking about reality - really, opening this stuff up is, by default, collaborative - so there IS no privacy. Also, you have a choice - you can make it internal/password protected, so there's no issue. You can lock it down to certain people/groups.. etc. Hope that helps explain it further! Michael – sure. She was talking about reality – really, opening this stuff up is, by default, collaborative – so there IS no privacy. Also, you have a choice – you can make it internal/password protected, so there’s no issue. You can lock it down to certain people/groups.. etc.

Hope that helps explain it further!

]]> By: MIchael Zimmer http://www.davidleeking.com/2009/03/31/cil2009-evaluating-recommending-justifying-20-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-21080 MIchael Zimmer Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:13:48 +0000 http://www.davidleeking.com/?p=1076#comment-21080 Hello David, I've been following your blog for some time and appreciate you posting notes from CIL. Wondering if you could expand on this bullet point: "invasion of privacy - not an issue…" What was the argument suggesting that privacy is not an issue wrt Library 2.0? Thanks, michael zimmer Hello David, I’ve been following your blog for some time and appreciate you posting notes from CIL.

Wondering if you could expand on this bullet point:
“invasion of privacy – not an issue…”

What was the argument suggesting that privacy is not an issue wrt Library 2.0?

Thanks,
michael zimmer

]]>