by David Lee King on December 17, 2009
Sorry – had a hiccup there. In March, I’m speaking at the COSUGI Conference! OK – I asked the same thing…. “what in the world does COSUGI stand for?” It stands for “Customers of Sirsidynix User Group Inc.”
Anyway, I’m giving a keynote and a couple of executive track sessions – on digital experience design and on reaching out to customers through virtual services (this one with MPOW’s Library Director Gina Millsap).
Here’s the blurb for the conference:
*******************************
Three action packed days. 100 informative sessions. 1,000 fellow SirsiDynix users.
Join us in warm, sunny Lake Buena Vista, Florida March 3rd, 4th and 5th for the 2010 version of the SirsiDynix COSUGI Executive Track Conference. This comprehensive three day information and training extravaganza will have you pumped and ready for an outstanding year ahead. You’ll get the latest news and product developments from SirsiDynix leaders, while industry movers and shakers share their knowledge and insight.
Find out:
* How SirsiDynix develops new product ideas
* How to get the most from your technology investments
* What makes a memorable digital experience for library patrons
* How to use market segmentation studies to get past the guesswork
* How to stay on strategy in tough economic times
* And much more!
You’ll also have the opportunity to socialize and network with your peers, and actually kick back and relax a bit, too. And don’t miss the gala SirsiDynix shindig on Wednesday night. Mark your calendar now, start packing your suitcase…and don’t forget the sunscreen. We look forward to seeing you in Florida!
You don’t want to miss the chance to connect. For the Full 2010 COSUGI Executive Track Schedule click here.
Register now for COSUGI 2010!
For more information about the entire conference, visit the conference home page.
March 3 – 5 | Walt Disney World Coronado Springs Resort
******************
Enjoy!
Tagged as:
codi,
cosugi,
ILS,
sirsi,
sirsidynix
by David Lee King on March 30, 2009
Speaker: Lee Rainie
Talking about Twitter …
- he asked “who’s tweeting this session?”
- Showing his year in twitter, how people interact with him. Funny stuff
The internet is the asteroid: then and now
- 2000 – 46% of adults use internet, 5% with broadband at home, 50% own cellphones, 0% connect to internet wirelessly, 10% use the “cloud” – slow, stationary connections built around my computer
- 2008 – 75% use internet, 57% with broadband at home, 82% use a cell phone, 62% connect wirelessly, 53% use cloud = fast, mobile connections built around outside servers and storage
Ecosystem changes:
- volume of information grows
- variety of information increases
- velocity of info speeds up – more stuff coming at us, stuff we care about – things in “our world”
- times and places to experience media enlarge – we have our own playlists, can watch media whenever (ie., on the bus, read news on our laptops or cellphones, etc)
- people’s vigilance for info expands and contracts – we can dig deeper when we want to – ie., health searches. We can get up to speed quickly when we want to.
- immersive qualities of media are more compelling – and we ain’t seen nothing yet
- relevance of info improves
- number of info voices explodes and becomes more findable – he claimed about 1/2 of adults are now content creators
- voting and ventilating are enabled
- social networks are more vivid
Behold Homo Connectus:
- a different species with a different sense of …
- expectation about access to into
- place and distance
- presence with others
- opportunities to play
- time use
- personal efficacy
- social networking possibilities
New tech-user typology
- new survey of 3300 adults
- 39% are motivated by mobility, 61% are tied to stationary media
- the 39%: being drawn into deeper use thanks to mobile connections, wireless connections prompt them to use the internet more, self expression and networking matters to them
- the 61%: don’t feel the pull of mobility, might have lots of technology, but it is relatively peripheral in their lives, they have plateaued in internet use, or are on the outskirts of digital life
10 groups – 5 motivated, 5 not so much:
Groups:
1. digital collaborators (8%)
- use their tech assets to work with and share their creations with others
- they lead the pack in every dimension of our analysis: assets, actions, attitudes towards tech
- always-on broaband, etc
- 56% male
- ge n x group – median age is 39 (oh yeah!!!)
- diverse racially
- 61% college + … pretty well off
- They are early adapters – people listen to them.
- libraries can serve them by having a place to jack into the internet. give them a place to collaborate and share. Enlist them in giving you coaching and feedback on the experiments with tech you want to try
2. ambivalent networkers 7% of pop
- they have folded mobile devices into how they run their social lives
- they tie in first place
- they want a break from it once in awhile
- younger – median age is 29
- funky facts – 30% are students, 34% are NOT email users, 83% are cell texters
- Libraries can serve them by being a sanctuary, and a place where they can go offline. offer a gaming haven, help them figure out the new etiquette of online social networks, help them navigate info overload
3. Media Movers 7%
- very social group
- they move media – find, create an info nugget, and pass it on
- love their cameras
- 34 is median age, 56% male, well-off
- Libraries: help them find outlets for sharing their creations, help navigate to material they can pass on to others, info sharing is a social currency – show them how to do it and support it
4. roving nodes 9%
- active managers of their social and work lives using their mobiel device
- 56% female, late 30s, well off, educated
- 100% have cell phone, heavy internet use at home and work
- librarie: help them be efficient, give them access to tech to they can check in, more efficient parents, teach them about using the cloud apps (calendaring, social bookmarking, etc)
5. Mobile newbies (85)
- really liek their cell phones
- they are new converts – getting a cell phone was like a conversion experience for them
- 55% female, median age 50, slightly less educated and lower income, weighted to minorities a bit
- libraries: coach, mentor, give them how-to material. offer tech access and support, offer pathways to the wonders of the web – they’re just getting their feet wet and don’t know about the useful and fun stuff they can find online
6.Desktop veterans 13%
- older veteran online users, use it at work
- happily connected and stationary.
- Their cell phone is for making phoncalls
- 55% male, 46 is median age
- libraries: offer them access, good connections, they are self-sufficient and don’t need alot of handholding
7. drifting surfers
- female 56%, 42 median age
- not into it so much – their husbands and kids use the net more than them and will help them find stuff
- libraries: don’t force tech on them, your traditional services are what appeals to them, etc
8. information encumbered
- male 67%, early 50s
- they feel overloaded, it feels like a burden
- libraries: sympathize with them, help them navigate, don’t force tech on them, be their filters for information
9. tech indifferent 10%
- 55% female
- they can take it or leave it
- 59 median age
- libraries: basic tutorials, libraries might be their only access to tech
10. off the network (14%)
- they don’t have access to the internet, no cell phones
- they love their old stuff – their landlines, their TVs
- 57% female, oldest – 67 is median age
- they tried internet, didn’t work out for them
- libraries: the traditional stuff, computer 101 classes
5 things when friending libraries:
- pathways to problem solving info. we’re the aggregator to our communities
- pathways to personal enrichment – we enhance people’s lives
- pathways to entertainment in new ways
- pathways to new kinds of social networks built around people, media and institutions – ie., you can friend an institution and a media outlet
- pathways to the wisdom of crowds, so you fill your own future here…
Tagged as:
cil,
cil09,
cil2009,
lee rainie,
pew
by David Lee King on March 16, 2009
Just saw the 2009 list of Library Journal Movers & Shakers. Can I just say there are a LOT of very awesome people in that list this year! FYI – check out Bobbi Newman’s list - it’s handy.
Also, there are lots of cool people I know in that list, including Michael, Sarah, Chad, Eric, Jaap, Geert, Karen, Jason, Joe, Lauren, Lori, Jenica, etc, etc etc – awesome (if I forgot you, please kick me later – I’m tired!). Congratulations to every single Mover & Shaker – each of you has earned this – way to go!
And an interesting aside – Bobbi’s list links both to the LJ write-ups on each person, and to their blogs if they have one. Did you notice? There are more bloggers than non-bloggers in the list. Just sayin.
Tagged as:
awards,
library journal,
movers & shakers
by David Lee King on October 7, 2008
What’s more ironic than Michael Gorman complaining about blogs and wikis on the Encyclopaedia Britannica’s blog? How about Library Journal’s recent decision to host the Annoyed Librarian’s anonymous blog?
Yep – that’s right. The same organization that publishes the Transparent Library column is now giving voice to … an anonymous blogger.
Library Journal claims to be “the oldest and most respected publication covering the library field.” I’ll ask – do you respect a publication that allows one of their writers to be anonymous, when that anonymity has been used in the past to attack other librarians and the work they do? Who also allows and encourages other librarians to anonymously say mean, hateful things in the comments of his/her anonymous blog? To me, that’s simply juvenile and irresponsible.
And now that same juvenile, irresponsible behavior has been paid, and has been given a voice … by “the oldest and most respected publication covering the library field.” Hmm… another irony noted.
Don’t get me wrong – I’m all for tearing down bad ideas, pointing out inconsistencies, sharing what I think … and have no problem when people do the same with me. That’s expected. But I also think it’s important to own one’s words … and you simply can’t do that when you’re anonymous. Maybe just me – but I think if you can’t say it when your name’s attached … maybe you shouldn’t say it at all.
So when a “respected” library publication starts writing with an anonymous voice, I get concerned.
Library Journal – As a 2008 Mover and Shaker, and as one who has been published in Library Journal publications in the past, I stand behind the words I write, and I expect you to do the same.
Readers – what do you think? I’d like to know.
Tagged as:
Blogging,
library journal,
libraryjournal,
stupidity
by David Lee King on March 16, 2008
I was just named a Library Journal Mover & Shaker for 2008 – how cool is that!??! For those that are interested, here are some links to the Movers & Shakers lists:
- My write-up (
I hope they correct my name soon – in the subheading, they smushed my middle and last names together so it reads “David LeeKing”
- now fixed – thanks, LJ!)
- Library Journal’s list for 2008
- Jessamyn’s better list for 2008
- A list of all Movers & Shakers – I’m in some good company
These things are awarded because some of you took the time to fill out the form and suggest me. That means a lot – THANK YOU SO MUCH! You guys – my friends, colleagues, readers, commenters, listeners, etc – really help push me and the ideas that stick in my head. When I write something stupid, you tell me. When I write something interesting, you build upon it. I find it amazing what some of us librarians and internet/information professionals can do… together.
Consider this award yours, too!
by David Lee King on March 16, 2007