http://www.davidleeking.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_16

Posts tagged as:

change

Presentations in Garland, TX

by David Lee King on August 17, 2009

Garland libraryLast Friday, I spoke at the Nicholson Memorial Library System in Garland, TX (a suburb of Dallas). It was a fun time – nice library, great people wanting to learn new things. Can’t beat that!

I spoke at their annual Staff Day, and gave two presentations: one on emerging trends, and one on change (both whopping 3-hour presentations). Both are embedded below.

Towards the end of the day, we poked around on the web a bit, and played with some of the websites I talked about in the presentations. So – for the Garland folks – here’s a list of websites we played with:

And for the presentations (fyi – for those wanting to see both presentations, click through to the actual post. For some reason, posting two embedded Slideshare presentations in the same posts makes the second embed disappear int he RSS feed version of my post):

And the afternoon presentation:

Fishing in the Rivers of Change … While Wearing Your Hip Boots

View more documents from David King.

Thanks, Nicholson Memorial Library System!

{ 0 comments }

We’ll Answer Within Two Business Days

by David Lee King on April 28, 2009

is this your electronic reference service?Here’s a pic of the reference desk at Anywhere Public Library in Fakeola, USA. As a service to their customers, they decided to create a sign letting their patrons know that their questions might not be answered right away.

After all, some questions simply aren’t answered instantaneously – staff might need to wander out in the stacks to find an appropriate resource, or the question might lend itself to a lengthy reference interview. And once in a great while, questions really DO take up to 2 days or so to get answered, so it seemed like the right thing to do to post this sign.

When asked about their sign, here’s what library staff said:

  • “in my experience, most questions do NOT take 2 days to answer, but isn’t it better to give a max time in the event that a question needs more thorough research? Librarians actually DO have other things to do with their time after all.”
  • “While it’s nice to say “We’ll get back to you as soon as possible”, some patrons want a definitive time frame.”
  • “We posted the “factual” limits and the 48 hour turnaround to buy ourselves wiggle room and to avoid the open-ended questions”
  • “Why does every question have to be answered right NOW? Honestly, if you need an answer right away, there’s this lovely invention called a telephone.”

OK – obviously, I’m fudging a bit. My reference desk pic is fake (my Photoshop skills astound no one). But the answers from “library staff?” These are all quotes from real librarians, commenting on my two previous posts about electronic reference service needing a reboot.

Some readers who thought my post was a bit over the top said one of three things:

  1. you have to give patrons a time frame [even though we mostly answer these questions pretty fast].
  2. you simply can’t answer lengthy reference questions via email or IM.
  3. We’re not discriminating and how dare you suggest we are! [OK, you're right. I used that word on purpose - made ya look! :-) ]

So – what do you think? Do you have to give patrons a time frame online? Are most of your email/electronic reference questions answered pretty fast? Do you think that long or detailed reference queries can be handled online?

{ 20 comments }

CIL2009: Helene Blowers’ Presentation

by David Lee King on March 31, 2009

OK, you caught me – I was updating my presentation, so missed the first part of this… so starting notes now.

Showing connections in LinkedIn – Helene is one person away from Barack Obama.

Showing the friendwheel on facebook – you can see the lines, see where your relationships are congregating. Interesting to see who knows who.

We need to think about social networks as we create these connections and sites for our customers

Cultural consumers thrive on info and ideas …

93% of teens are online… nearly 2/3s of online teens are content creators.

Showing how there’s a switch from authoritative control of content to collaborative control – wikipedia vs britannica – wikipedia won (britannica added a wiki)

Trusted Media Index – digital natives trust their networks and experience more than older people

Digital safety: only .08% of all students say they’ve actually met someone in person from an online encounter without their parents’ permission.

Most teens ignore strangers who contact them online

About 1 in 3 teens are nonconformists, and break online safety or behavior rules … they know what they’re doing (to some extent – they don’t realize the global reach it can have)

Digitally – there are no barriers. the playing field is leveled. access is universal. connection is ubiquitous. It’s all about ME. = a ton of opportunities.

Digital piracy. digital natives think of this as sharing.

talking about remixing of content. Creative Commons, remixing music, fan fiction, etc.

Quote – in the past, you were what you owned. Now you are what you share.

Digital Advocacy

Strategy Framework that Columbus Metropolitan Library is using. Question: what elements need to be present in order for our strategies to support virtual users?

1. young mind
2. virtual users:
engage – enable customers to connect with library staff, services, and with each other in meaningful ways. Goal. Our customers feel connected.
Enrich – to provide customers with a rich online experience that enhances their local branch experience & daily lives. Goal: our customer feel they’re getting value.
Empower – to enable customers the ability to personalize and add value to the library experience and allow the community to celebrate themselves. Goal: our customers feel good about themselves.
3. power users

With this framework, the goal isn’t to answser “should we have facebook?” Instead, they are asking does it engage, enrich, and enable customers?

So the real goal – look for tools that meet these things

{ 1 comment }

SXSWi2009: Change (v2)

by David Lee King on March 14, 2009

Speaker – Lawrence Lessig

aside – GREAT speaker. Fun use of Keynote, well-paced.

He’s talking about current issues – scientists taking large sums of money from drug companies … and then they “approve” a drug, other similar money things (ie., lobbyists)

Money is not evil

These dependencies weaken trust
- scientists say it’s ridiculous to say that the money they get affects their viewpoints
- politicians say the same thing

Wow – basically showing how lobbyists influence government. Scary.

His point – government gets easy 2+2=4 style questions wrong, because they are guided by dependencies that guide them the wrong way

Now talking about government-regulation / extortion problems

A great way to change this:
- only taking donations from citizens, each person capped at $250
- another idea – don’t give any more money to politicians until they agree to this.
- His site – http://change-congress.org/

{ 0 comments }

Michael Wilson moderated. MIles Sims, Christian Caldwell, Rebecca Caro, Peter Kim were panelists

hashtag #sml

Qs From audience were asked first: how do you get a trial going to help get their feet wet, convincing another agency’s “man” (if you’re a consultant). Selling to a board, monetization goals to show the man, and something else …

Why does it make sense/how will this make money/ROI foundation thing?

Caldwell – (works at the American Heart Assoc) – reach was important – allowing whole organization the ability to get message out – larger reach is good. Did lots of explaining, showed examples, etc.

Sims – Reach isn’t necessarily instant money – but it holds real value.

(aside – funny – a spontaneous yelling match between our session and another one)

Kim – have to show equivalency and analogy – (showing similar costs for different types of ad dollars, I think. Also sometimes showing cost

Basically, an ROI model for social media varies greatly – it depends on your organization, the customers you target, etc etc.

Top questions that need to be addressed:

Sims – these questions happen after the fact many times …

What can it do for us, our customers, how does it help my customers.

What can the company handle, who in the company can get on board early without having to do detailed ROI models?

Caroe – need to look at your company culture. IE – if your comapny would freak out if they saw negative publicity, they might not be ready yet

Wow – the panel’s talking about having to get legal into the projects… yikes!

Loss of control (Kim) – it’s a misconception. You still have control – just looks different. Control over message and control over brand.

What do you do when social media creates/requires a culture change?

Kim – a matter of perspective. Described a change of focus – the company already had bloggers, they figured out how to use those bloggers

Caroe – describes a company ceo who got fed up with bad publicity and untrue mentions, so started a blog to tell “the truth” about their company

Sims – showing how it impacts our business. Show small successes and start small, then you can slowly start to snowball into greater change

Caldwell – show successes and failures. Failure is cool – show no fear. Colleagues saw no one getting fired, bosses saw learning, so transparency worked.

Kim – it’s GOT to change, so our choice is whether or not to stay at your organization and work on change, or simply go somewhere else where social media is already accepted

Does the pitch change depending on the audience?

Caroe – play to the audience – finance wants to hear about money. Does someone want a promotion? Show them how your project will help them get that promotion. Find out their motivations and change your strategy to match those motivations.

Kim – myth – young adults ALWAYS do all social media things. He said he’s been on strategy calls where the company they’re working with will include their summer intern … “because she’s young!”

Caldwell – wanted to share women’s stories about cardiovascular diseases – they mentioned it on facebook, quickly had over 1000 videos they had to screen – Sounds like it was a good kind of failure…

Caldwell – started recuiting the resisters – cool idea. He found out what they wanted to push, what their goals were, then showed how social media could help meet those goals. The resister (in at least one case) became the champion.

How do we help make the project a success?

Caldwell – have to point out it’s not a short-term game. It’s a long-term thing, and they need to have ongoing conversations

Sims – set expectations early

Caldwell – have to trust people. Don’t worry about people playing and not doing their jobs. With PCs, it was Solitaire. Before that, paper could be a distraction!

If you have marketing types/corporate communications departments that haven’t gotten it yet … find their peers that DO get it, and introduce them.

Pull it out of people at the beginning – stop by the watercooler, ask people to guest-blog.

Aside from money, what else do you use to pitch the idea?

Caroe – recruiting new prospects and having that in a database…
Caldwell – the speed of research. Get instant feedback
Kim – bottom line is always how will you make money (I think he’s wrong for non-profits and libraries)

{ 6 comments }

The Beginning of the New Normal

by David Lee King on March 9, 2009

change agentTwo posts caught my eye over the past couple of days, and they’re still rumbling around inside my head … let’s see if I can pull a couple thoughts out of the cacophony.

Both posts discuss how lots of industries are at the beginnings of huge restructuring/remaking themselves or are disappearing entirely, and how much of our lives will seem like upheaval until the “new normal” is reached. No one’s exactly sure what “normal” will look like (after the recession and remaking is over) – but everyone’s sure it will be completely different from now.

Here’s the first article, and the main one setting off thoughts for me: The Great Restructuring, by Jeff Jarvis. Jeff talks about our recession – first quoting Umair Haque calling it a great “compression … as an economy built on perceived value reconciles with actual value.”

Jeff also mentions this article from the New York Times and ends up calling our current recession a “great restructuring.” Then, he lists thoughts about quite a few industries and their future. Here’s a partial list of them:

  • America may well not be in the auto industry soon.
  • Financial services will have to be completely remade
  • Newspapers will vanish
  • Magazines are in worse shape than I would have guessed and many will go
  • Books’ channels of manufacturing, distribution, and sales will go through upheaval
  • Broadcast media will become meaningless, replaced by digital delivery
  • Large-scale retail will shrink and consolidate and then be transformed by a search-and-buy economy
  • The blockbuster economy in entertainment will become harder to support as more attention and money shifts to the tail.
  • We should be so lucky that elementary and secondary education will also face such pressure.

And that’s just a few (go read the article for the whole list and some great thoughts).

Here’s the second article raising a ruckus in my head: Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011 from TechCrunch. This article mainly gives a music executive’s perspective of coming changes for his industry, and how they currently plan to figure it out. So it’s one industry’s perspective on how change will ultimately play out for them. Interesting take.

My question to you – are you ready?

Look at that list from the first article: books, magazines, newspapers, media. All going through huge changes, all going to be remade. And all stuff that’s near and dear to our librarian hearts!

Some of these changes are already starting, you know:

  • Newspapers and Magazines have already started going digital. It’s just a matter of time before more/most decide to stop printing that paper thing and go completely digital.
  • Books… {David quickly ducks} DON’T freak out! Of course I think people will still read books. That’s a given. But have you looked around lately and seen the Amazon Kindle? Or the iPhone ebook reader that millions of people are now carrying around? I have a book on mine to read right now. Those 300-page paper things will eventually turn digital – because it’s simply a container for the content – not the content itself.
  • Music and movies – think LPs/8-Tracks, Cassettes, CDs or super 8, 16 ml, vcr, DVD … and compare that to iTunes or Netflix emerging subscription models. Also going digital!

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg for libraries – most of our huge buildings exist to primarily hold physical stuff. What will we do when there’s no physical stuff to hold? Will you still be able to justify that large building? That staff? (My answer to that is yes, you can … if you are planning for change now).

How are you starting to re-think your services and libraries? My library is in the middle of strategic planning, and we’re going to tackle that whole “re-think everything” approach. Looks like Darien Library has been doing that, too. How about you?

Closing thought – I live in lucky times – I get to see … basically … my whole life change before my eyes. And I get to help it change.

Bonus reading:

  • An interesting article on remaking education
  • This post is where I found the title of for my article … good post, too – focuses on economic stuff

{ 21 comments }

Speakers:
Michael Casey & Michael Stephens

This session is a standing-room only session!

Organizations are starting to let their staff blog – huge change from not long ago

Not always easy to implement new things

Quote: “Every time people really like something, we get rid of it.” real quote from librarian at PLA. Ouch.

Showing signs from libraries – bad signs from libraries! People are talking about us. What stuff are you giving them to talk about?

Asking – What are your roadblocks?
inability to use open source software
we’ve always done it this way
control-freak IT support
No admin priviledges
only making cosmetic changes
budget
no time
The excessive love of process
Luddite trustees

Road map to transparency
open conversation (aside – nice slide!)
visit the front lines
cross train, provide learning for all staff
consider the role of anonymity
what would you add?

Don’t ask staff for input if you are not going to use it

Going to the field:
bring them out (managers)
visit the front lines
examine different staffing models
develop big picture understanding
administrators should understand everyone’s roles
get out of the office!
decisions are not made in a vacuum
crucial if administrators are not librarians

Circ staff at Darien Library:
they are blogging
they are buying books for the collection
they are going to BookExpo (a conference)
They are trusted and encouraged

Face to face is important!
Casey – taking an academic approach with office hours – once a week for 3 hours, anyone can come in and meet with him, off the record if need be, but face-to-face.

Say “Yes!

{ 0 comments }

CIL2008, Day 2: Innovation Starts with “I”

by David Lee King on April 8, 2008

Speakers: Helene Blowers, Tony Tallent

How do we get the innovation and change to occur? This track is about that – how to move our organizations forward.

Talking about the ingredients of innovation

What’s innovation NOT?
process improvement
strategic planning
best practice
benchmarking
etc…

What is it?
it’s an intersection
a pivotal point

Creativity is thinking up new things.
Innovation is doing new things. It’s action.

Book to read – the seeds of innovation by elaine dundon.

Innovation is Fresh Practice! (rather than best practice)

4 components of I:
creativity
strategy
implementation
profitability

Creative is I

I am an innovator:
i have ideas
i have done my homework
I’ll do the initial legwork
i am capable of more than my job description
i am a leader, too
i take risks with you

More:
I offer you a framework
i put \resources behind my expectations
i create growth opportunities
i SUPPORT your work
i celebrate your success
i take risks with you

Create alliances – get others on board with your ideas – sell them

prototype your idea

Don’t ask for permission – ask for support!

Sell your vision personally – don’t do it on paper. Actually, I’d say it differently – sell it multiple ways. On paper (BRIEF), person to person, via presentation, etc.

People need to SEE something, so prototype it

What’s wild success look like?
IT will not feel like business as usual.

It’s also about failure – if you’re not failing once in awhile, you’re not being innovative enough.

{ 5 comments }