http://www.davidleeking.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_16

From the category archives:

Blogging

Why “Getting it” Matters

by David Lee King on April 6, 2009

OK… I’m a card-carrying member of the American Library Association, and it’s voting time again. Every year, we vote for a president (and a lot of other stuff). This year, there are two candidates for ALA President – Kent Oliver and Roberta Stevens. Both fine, highly qualified people, I’m sure (though I’ve never met either one).

As a web-centric, social media loving geekboy, here’s what I noticed when I visited their websites:

Roberta Stevens:

  • Cool. She has a website.
  • Dated design … looks like a fine site from the year 1999
  • big fat Donate button (actually the first thing I noticed)
  • where’s the RSS feed … hey, wait a minute … why isn’t this a blog-based site with commenting?
  • a mish-mash of text links that point to videos, photos, podcasts, webpages, and pdf files
  • a link to a Facebook Fan page
  • Ah – there’s her blog – one of the many text links points to it.
  • Oops – I clicked through to her blog. She has embedded a YouTube video there …  but it broke her blog template.

Kent Oliver:

  • Cool. He has a website too. A nicely designed site, looks a bit like Obama’s recent campaign site
  • it’s a blog – the RSS feed is right there, where it should be (subscribed)
  • two quick links to platform and qualifications
  • a Donate Now button that blends in with the rest of the site
  • an embedded video (used blip.tv – coolness)
  • Flickr images, embedded on the main page so I can see them…
  • a search box!
  • no one’s commented on his blog posts yet (currently displaying big 0’s beside each post)
  • Oops – just clicked on Platform. Instead of getting his actual platform, I got two more links… same with the Qualifications link.

Honestly, once I get past all that stuff and take a peek at their actual platforms, it’s all the usual stuff (diversity, more money, support privacy, etc) – nothing that stands out as remarkably interesting to me, a lover of all things web (which is a reflection of ME, not them :-) ).

But – looking at the two lists above … who do you think “gets it?” Who either understands new online media, or at least knows who to ask for help? Will that sway my vote (and the votes of many others)? Probably so.

Yes, understanding “the new stuff” is definitely important, and can make or break a campaign.

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 10 comments }

SXSWi2009: Dad is the New Mom

by David Lee King on March 16, 2009

Panelists:

Bonin Bough, PepsiCo – the moderator
Chris Brogan, New Marketing Labs … and has a dad blog
Brad Powell, IFC/Dadlabs, Inc.
Jory Des Jardins, BlogHer, LLC
Ann-Marie Nichols, This Mama Cooks

Introductions …

Powell – they post reviews – if it’s good or bad. They’ve gotten flack about that. They’ve actually had to say they’re not doing an infomercial

Chris says he gets a lot of mom readers instead of dad readers

Question – is blogging changing you as a parent?

They have to self-censor, make sure to not share some stuff without making it too personal

Powell – says blogging did change him. He’s now more reflective. Because he’s getting sort of a crowd-sourced conversation going about parenting ideas ie., he’ll throw something out, someone else will add to it and make him think.

Hee – Des Jardins said “momosphere” – just sounds funny to me …

Chris thinks brands want human reviewers who are honest.

Q&A has started

Is it bad to make money blogging? Of course not. You have to work hard, though…

It’s what you make of it…

Where do you draw the line between personal and business? So far, they’re not answering the question. Instead, they are talking about getting sponsorships ??? Uhm. Not. The. Question. Dude.

Thank you – someone actually brought the discussion back to the actual question! Yay!

She uses pseudonyms … someone wanted a sponsorship with a big photo of them and their kids – she talked to her husband, and they went ahead and did it – they figured they were already sorta out there anyway, and it would be ok.

Chris mentioned content marketing – instead of writing about a product, write about the type of people who would use the product

Q: A GM dude with a question – he’s had some bloggers come to him asking for a car for a year – when he turns them down, they say “well, I can go to a competitor …” what to do?

A: the cream of the crop rises …

[my answer. Sheesh. Both the company shelling out cars AND the famous bloggers need to get over themselves. At that point, the original focus of the blog has been lost. Probably the focus of the company, too]

[aside - guy asking a question has a Flip on a clip ... on his belt. Cool. And it rthymes, too]

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 0 comments }

SXSWi2009: Video Blogging: Turning Wine into Gold

by David Lee King on March 15, 2009

Gary Vaynerchuk (Wine Library TV), someone else who is interviewing him – can’t read the name…

Gary turned 30, realized there was alot more that he wanted to do. He watched ZeFrank’s videos and some others, and thought “I can do that.”

Claims it’s hard being an extreme extrovert. But you have to be who you are.

Gary has a new book coming out  it’s about “business.”

You can be an expert in social media marketing. But if your product’s terrible, it won’t help.

If you’re a jerk, your intern is flip-camming you

Don’t email Gary about camera or lighting. The content is king – not the tools.

When Gary started, he went to every single wine blog and left comments with links back to his blog.

You have to find your audience – not by pitching them, but by sharing & joining in the community

How funny – Gary grew up around wine tasting and wondered why people weren’t saying “this wine tastes like Big League Chew?” So he started doing that with his blog.

You can only live your life once. Gary wants to do it 100% happy. No reason not to make yourself as happy as possible.

None of this works if you live for weekends and vacations. He didn’t touch on this much, but – this is a HUGE point. Thanks for saying this!

(fyi – this is a Q&A session now). How do you deal with being “known?” Ask yourself “who am I” – if you don’t want people to know that, then you need to stop.

When did you start making money with video? He makes money becuase people know him. He got his book gig because people know him … etc.

Wow. he reads over 1000 emails a day! It’s his job.

Too many people don’t make decisions to survive – you have to decide to run your business like a business.

People who are unfocused – stay unfocused, but do that stuff really well.

Never wait for something to happen – go get it instead

Being successful – part of it is just keeping on doing it – outlast the competition

Delegate everything except what you love

Gary’s goal – owning the Jets.

Q – how do you “get in the zone?” Gary – “I’m there when I wake up every day.”

(aside – you REALLY have to be here – Gary is hilarious!)

Numbers/followers don’t mean anything. What matters are the people who CARE.

Puting out your content is only the FIRST thing to do – you have to do lots of work after that, too

And a couple other quotes/questions that I didn’t get…

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 0 comments }

Digital Branch Style Guide

by David Lee King on February 10, 2009

Thought someone might find this useful – it’s the styleguide we use for my library’s digital branch! It’s a long document, broken up into these sections:

  • General Guidelines for Blog Posts
  • Citing/Attribution
  • Featured Section
  • Comments – What to do with them
  • Creating a “Voice”
  • How Can I Get a Conversation Started?
  • I have a suggestion/problem. What do I do with it?
  • Staff Responsibilities

******************

Digital Branch Style Guide

Please follow these guidelines when writing blog posts on our public website. This document is a start – I hope to add to it as needed. Notice something glaringly obvious that I haven’t listed? Email it to me.

General Guidelines for Blog Posts

Post frequency/length:

  • Frequency:
    • 2 posts per week for each Subject Guide
    • Posts in the Services section – as needed
  • Length:
    • sufficient to cover topic
    • shorter is always better – just enough to cover the content

Formatting:

  • one space between sentences – not two!
  • avoid ALL CAPS
  • use a spell checker
  • break post into small paragraphs rather than one large chunk of text

Post titles:

  • keep them short, snappy, and descriptive
  • capitalize every word except prepositions (like a book title)

Internal Post Structure:

  • Bulleted lists are great
  • Subheads are great – helps people quickly scan content
  • Images that complement article tend to attract readers

specific words – Be consistent with these terms:

  • email (all one word, all lowercase)
  • website (all one word, all lowercase)
  • webpage (all one word, all lowercase)
  • web (lowercase)
  • Internet (uppercase “I”)
  • Our library – first reference is “Topeka & Shawnee County Public Library.” Second reference is “the library.”
  • Our website is “the Digital Branch.”
  • Refer to our Neighborhoods by their full title (i.e., the Travel neighborhood, the Health Information neighborhood)

Summary of post

  • Each post should have a summary – there are two ways to do this:
    • Create a summary paragraph in the summary box
    • Leave the summary blank – the beginning of the post will automatically be used as the summary

Tags:

  • Use 2-3 descriptive tags for each post
  • Tags are usually keywords that are descriptive of the content of a post
  • These should be different from a category. Ex – a post could be in the Books Subject Guide with a Category of Sci-Fi, and have tags like Steampunk, Robots, and Mars.

Links:

  • For book titles
    • make the book title the link text
    • don’t include the URL with the book title
      • Do this: The Hobbit (where “The Hobbit” is the text used for the link)
      • Don’t do this: The Hobbit – http://catalog.tscpl.org/asdfhasdf/etc.htm (where “The Hobbit” is NOT the link text, but the URL is also used as the link text)
  • Other links
    • When linking to webpages or blog posts, make the webpage title or the blog article title the link text
    • Refer to the link within a sentence, like this: “Topeka has a great library that everyone should visit.” (“great library” would be the link text used for our library’s URL)
    • Another example: don’t write “you can read the full report here” – using words like “here” or “click here” is generally bad practice. Instead, say “the charity released a report, which said…” (“a report” is the link text, and is incorporated within the sentence). This type of internal link reads better.

Citing / Attribution

It’s important to give proper attribution to sources, even online. Here’s how to do it:

  • Blog posts, newspaper articles, other websites
    • See the Links section above for linking
    • When you quote someone else’s text, make sure to link to the original source.
    • With the link to the original source, reference the site. For example, say “Here’s a lovely article on the Topeka Ave. bridge project (from the Topeka Capital Journal).” “Lovely article” links to the specific article, and “Topeka Capital Journal” links to the newspaper’s main site.
  • Images
    • If using an image from flickr, photobucket, or some other photo sharing service, include some type of attribution/pointer back to the original photo at the end of the article (i.e., “photo courtesy of JimBob” – “JimBob” would link back to the original photo).
    • Use photos with a Creative Commons license when possible
  • Videos
    • Include some type of link/attribution/pointer back to the original video (i.e., link back to the YouTube video if you use a video from YouTube)
  • How much of a quote can I do?
    • The U.S. Copyright Office FAQ on fair use (http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-fairuse.html) says this: “it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports. There are no legal rules permitting the use of a specific number of words, a certain number of musical notes, or percentage of a work.”
    • Don’t quote the whole thing!

Featured Section

The Featured Section is structured this way:

The first Feature Box is called Featured.

  • It features big programs, events and special features of the library.
  • Populated by PR and Event Resources

Guidelines for the other Feature Boxes:

  • The other feature boxes include Books, Research, Movies & Music, Gallery, Kids, and Teens.
  • These sections usually focus on content (Gallery, Kids and Teens boxes can post about a program)
  • Handouts, booklists, links should be part of that post. No programs with registration and limits should be posted there.

Comments – what to do with them?

  • respond
    • thank them for their comment
    • add something if possible – point to another similar book, a link on our site, etc.
    • if it’s a question, answer it
    • if it’s a criticism, answer it – or refer it to someone who Can respond appropriately
    • If the comment is negative, don’t repeat it! Respond without repeating the negative question/comment.
  • In general, don’t edit the comment. Usually, it’s better to correct in another comment. Only edit if the comment:
    • Has “bad” words (that our automatic naughty word filter didn’t catch)
    • Is derogatory
    • Has an unrelated link
  • delete if spam. For example: “I have checked that really there was great information regarding that. There was another also – http://healthbeautyproduct.blogspot.com/” is a spam comment. Usually, spam comments include this type of stuff:
    • poor grammar (sounds like they don’t really know the language)
    • PLUS links to unrelated websites
  • What to do if you don’t know what to do – ask the web team to read the comment.

Creating a “Voice”

  • Write in a conversational tone:
    • goal is to start conversations
    • if you wouldn’t say it in conversation, don’t write it
    • write “friendly” – just like we are at the desk!
  • Use active voice. Example – don’t write “The tree was struck by lightning.” Instead, write “Lightning struck the tree.”
  • Use inverted pyramid writing style (explanation at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pyramid)
  • The first couple of sentences of your post displays as the summary, and appears in various places on our site as teasers to the whole article – so make it snappy!
  • Write in present tense when possible. Ex:
    • Don’t write “the book signing will be held next Tuesday”
    • Instead, write “the book signing is next Tuesday”

How Can I Get a Conversation Started?

Here are a couple of ideas on getting conversations started on your blog.

  • Write great content (always top priority)
  • Take part in the conversation:
    • read blogs and Topeka-area newspapers that allow comments
    • read blogs in your area of expertise
    • leave comments on those blogs, linking to your post in the comment
    • also link to those blogs in your post
  • Focus your posts on goals:
    • Before you write, answer this – “what do you want the reader to do?”
    • Provide a call to action (ie., tell them what you want them to do)
    • Ask for a response
    • Point them to things (like books in our catalog)

I have a suggestion/problem. What do I do with it?

Problems:

  • email the web team
  • tell us what’s wrong
  • include links or descriptive text if possible

Ideas for the site:

  • Email the web team/Digital Branch Manager:
    • Include description of idea
    • Digital Branch Manager will set up meeting if needed, share idea with web team and/or Managers, etc
    • Remember – all ideas are great, but not all ideas will be implemented on the site
  • hold regular meetings
    • i.e.., fun in Topeka blog meeting
    • discuss ideas
    • make suggestions to the web team

Staff Responsibilities

Blog moderator

  • make sure there are 2 posts per week
  • encourage writers
  • check in with Digital Branch Manager periodically
  • schedule regular meetings of content area
  • all the blog author stuff

Blog authors

  • write posts
  • check links
  • respond to comments
  • delete spam
  • periodically touch base with blog moderator

Digital Branch Manager

  • big picture development of branch
    • strategic planning
    • trend watching
  • talking to internal groups
  • talking to external groups
  • mentoring digital branch staff
  • developing new content areas and unique services and tools

Web Team

  • Webmaster/designer and Web Developer
  • designs new pages
  • keeps design fresh
  • day to day operations
  • maintenance and upgrades
  • builds new stuff
Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 21 comments }

I Don’t Trust the Library Journal

by David Lee King on October 7, 2008

What’s more ironic than Michael Gorman complaining about blogs and wikis on the Encyclopaedia Britannica’s blog? How about Library Journal’s recent decision to host the Annoyed Librarian’s anonymous blog?

Yep – that’s right. The same organization that publishes the Transparent Library column is now giving voice to … an anonymous blogger.

Library Journal claims to be “the oldest and most respected publication covering the library field.” I’ll ask – do you respect a publication that allows one of their writers to be anonymous, when that anonymity has been used in the past to attack other librarians and the work they do? Who also allows and encourages other librarians to anonymously say mean, hateful things in the comments of his/her anonymous blog? To me, that’s simply juvenile and irresponsible.

And now that same juvenile, irresponsible behavior has been paid, and has been given a voice … by “the oldest and most respected publication covering the library field.” Hmm… another irony noted.

Don’t get me wrong – I’m all for tearing down bad ideas, pointing out inconsistencies, sharing what I think … and have no problem when people do the same with me. That’s expected. But I also think it’s important to own one’s words … and you simply can’t do that when you’re anonymous. Maybe just me – but I think if you can’t say it when your name’s attached … maybe you shouldn’t say it at all.

So when a “respected” library publication starts writing with an anonymous voice, I get concerned.

Library Journal – As a 2008 Mover and Shaker, and as one who has been published in Library Journal publications in the past, I stand behind the words I write, and I expect you to do the same.

Readers – what do you think? I’d like to know.

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 65 comments }

Why Did I Start Blogging?

by David Lee King on September 8, 2008

Meredith included me in a cool meme – How I got started blogging. I thought I’d answer… and looking back, I just realized it’s my 5 year Blogiversary! I’ve been blogging for 5 whole years… wow!

Onto Meredith’s questions:

1. How did you get into blogging?

It’s Gary Price’s fault, ultimately. On May 6, 2003, I moderated Gary Price’s session on “Blogging for the Greater Good of Researchers” at the InfoToday 2003 (National Online 2003) conference. Gary used Blogger to create his presentation. At the time, what Gary was doing honestly didn’t make much sense to me. I remember thinking “why would I use Blogger when my web developer just built a CMS from scratch?” But I thought I should try out the new interesting tool to see what it could do for me and my library.

Sometime after that presentation, I started reading a couple of blogs, and started using some social tools like Bloglines and IM.

I also started fooling around with Blogger. I wasn’t about to start a personal blog – I’m just not that interesting! However, I realized that I wasn’t seeing much in the way of library website-focused blogs, and thought I might be able to pull that topic off… so I started tentatively posting stuff. My first “real” post was on September 12, 2003 (I think I deleted some older “just testing this stupid blog thing out” posts).

By October 2004, I had fallen into my “what’s in David’s head” groove, writing about stuff that was… well… floating around in my head. Ideas I decided to develop “out loud,” so to speak – in front of you – in a blog format.

And by February 2005, I had started videoblogging, too. Again, primarily because I needed a way to test new ideas, and couldn’t test them off my library’s website.

2. How did you gain an audience?

Hmm… Ultimately, I think my audience grew because of three things:

  • good content (y’all read it, anyway :-)
  • networking – At Computers in Libraries 2004, I met Jenny Levine, Steven Cohen, and Michael Stephens. This was my first “try not to be a complete wallflower” conference – and I eventually worked up the courage to comment on their blogs, and share my blog with them in the process.
  • marketing – I’m no marketer, but I’m no dummy either. At every speaking and writing gig, I started mentioning my blog. I can vividly remember when Bloglines told me there were a whopping 30 people subscribed to my blog :-)

3. What advice would you give to new bloggers who want to make a name for themselves in the biblioblogosphere?

First off, don’t try to “make a name for yourselves.” That’s the wrong approach (I’ll delete your email and ignore your blog, anyway). Instead, do this:

  • Start a blog, and write good content. Figure out what other “popular” bloggers are writing about, and write about the same thing. Add your own spin to it.
  • Or, write about innovative or new things your library is doing.
  • make sure to link to other blogger’s posts when writing your own post (making sure the link is actually relevant, of course) … cause we’ll notice. Most of us have vanity feeds set up to monitor what others say about us.
  • start commenting on blog posts (and leave your blog URL in the comments). That gets you noticed in two ways: 1. if you comment on my blog, I’ll notice (well, duh David) and 2. people interested in the topic will notice – they’ll comment, they’ll see your comment, and they’ll very likely check your blog post out, as well.
  • Speaking or writing anywhere? Make sure to mention your blog.
  • And then keep it up. Again – I’ve been doing it for 5 years. Building up an audience takes time.

that’s it. That’s my secret sauce… and now… who to pick next? How about Jessamyn, Jenny, Steven, and Michael?

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 5 comments }

Complainers and Blog Comments

by David Lee King on June 19, 2008

Two more posts from my reading of Mobilizing Generation 2.0: A Practical Guide to Using Wb 2.0 Technologies to Recruit, Organize, and Engage Youth, by Ben Rigby. On pages 51-52, Beth Kanter (make sure to check out her blog) wrote Overcoming the Barriers to Blogging – a between-the-chapters essay, answering some common objections to blogging. One is this: “What if a blog reader complains about our organization so that everyone can read it? What if their complaint is not based on facts or the truth?”

Beth’s answer: “Truth be told, people are going to complain, and complaints aren’t always based on the facts. But isn’t it better that you hear from your constituents so that you can (1) address their perceptions directly and (2) use their comments as an opportunity for free market research?”

My library’s digital branch allows commenting without up-front moderation. We think of it almost like a controlled room – we can listen to all the discussions, and we can correct them when needed. People WILL complain and get facts wrong. If you provide an easy-to-use discussion space on your organization’s blog, you have an opportunity to hold conversations with your customers – and you can correct them and explain what’s REALLY going on when needed. Much better to supply a controlled place to air complaints than to let them be aired elsewhere (like the local newspaper’s editorial section) where you DON’T have any say in the matter, or even in your response.

I’d also go a couple steps further than that, and subscribe to some ego feeds for your organization. I have set up Google Alerts, Technorati searches, and Summize searches for variations on my library’s name. They come to my Google Reader inbox, and I can scan through them and respond or pass the info along when needed. It takes next-to-no time to do, and it’s a way to digitally “meet” your customers in their favorite hangouts.

Real conversations. Real useful. And we can easily respond. This is a no-brainer!

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 6 comments }

Engaging Your Community

by David Lee King on June 17, 2008

Trivia Night September 2007Still reading and thinking about blogs – it’s the fault of Mobilizing Generation 2.0: A Practical Guide to Using Wb 2.0 Technologies to Recruit, Organize, and Engage Youth, by Ben Rigby. It’s a good book – I suggest you read it!

So today, I give you two thoughts about blogging and engaging blog communities.

On page 28, Ben writes: “A handful of elite political bloggers now wield tremendous influence, but like celebrity reporters, they’re in constant demand and are therefore more difficult to contact. However, they rely on so-called B-list bloggers for story sourcing. By looking at comments and links on an elite blogger’s site, you can begin to understand the structure of his or her network. You can reach out to the less popular bloggers and become a trusted source to them. In turn, they will feed your perspective and ideas to the elite bloggers.”

Engage the A Listers

There’s two ways to look at this. First, the obvious way. Want Robert Scoble or Chris Brogan or the ReadWriteWeb dudes to notice you? Find out who they read, then engage THOSE authors. The “B list” authors are more likely to hold conversations with you. If you strike up an engaging conversation with them, and that conversation ends up in the B lister’s blog, then … you just might get noticed by the “big guys.” Of course, if you’re like me, you’re starting way down the list (maybe the “Y Listers”?), so I have a much longer road to travel (unless the bloggers I linked to actually read their ego feeds – if you do, please say hi!).

Engage Your Community

Secondly, the much more interesting way. Ben continues (on page 29): “By developing trusted relationships and treating bloggers as a core part of your outreach efforts, you can take a proactive role in shaping news that affects your organization. You’ll also be prepared to respond rapidly to negative news and to promote your achievements.”

This means engaging local bloggers, or bloggers near and dear to your organization. In libraries, this means other librarians (to bounce ideas off of) and THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. Find bloggers in your area. Subscribe. Engage. Repeat.

There ARE bloggers in your area, already saying stuff about you. You have a chance to engage those bloggers and be a little more in control of what is said – at the least by correcting bad information or providing an another viewpoint to the situation. Better yet – you have a chance to tell your story to your community. Share your good stuff. Ask how you can make it better.

But to do that, you have to engage.

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 3 comments }

The Actionable Blog

by David Lee King on June 16, 2008

I’m reading Mobilizing Generation 2.0: A Practical Guide to Using Wb 2.0 Technologies to Recruit, Organize, and Engage Youth, by Ben Rigby. Page 20 talks about Amnesty International starting a blog, and says this:

“One of Amnesty’s key objectives is to encourage offline action, which the blog achieves. On the day [the author] visited [the website], a recent post in the “Student Activism” area called for students to spend some of their summer vacation sending postcards … Amnesty’s blog both asks for participation and shows results from past involvement, a method of engagement often called “closing the feedback loop.” The loop begins when a supporter takes action and closes when the organization shows the results of that action.”

That quote, along with my continued thinking and working on implementing the GTD method of personal organization and management, made me wonder what an “actionable” blog would look like in our libraries. Yes, I think it’s a spin-off of my earlier idea of inviting participation, so I’m either still stuck in that mode or I’m still developing the idea… you decide.

Back to my actionable blog idea – I think an actionable blog would not simply announce upcoming events or new purchases at the library. It wouldn’t even simply invite readers to come to the event or check out the book.

Instead, the content of an actionable blog post would require an action. It would be active rather than passive. Our public library’s summer reading program is an example of that. We give kids a sheet to work on – they have to read so many books. It’s an actionable thing for them to do (read the books, fill out the sheet). If they do, they get a prize.

Can’t our blog posts be a little more like that, too? How would that look in a library setting? I think we would ask for an action to be done. Just like in email, when you really need soemthing to be done, you might say this in the subject heading of the email – response required…  then you might follow up in a week or so.

I guess one example would be to ask a question. We’re doing that in our posts titled “What’s in Your Top 5?” We name our top 5 movies, music, etc… and then ask our readers what are their top five? That’s actionable, because it’s asking for a response.

Can we do this in the social networking services we’re starting to use? I think so. Try it out, see what happens. Ask for some participation of your customers, and you just might be surprised.

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 6 comments }

I recently saw Sarah, Michael, and Marcus discussing the peer review/journal article/blog thing, and Michael mentioned the long time it takes to get something into print publication via a print journal.

Here’s an example of that. Remember those posts from a few years back, from a few different bloggers, on how to lose your techie staff? I have recently (almost) published an article based on those posts. Here’s a run-down of the dates, which I find interesting:

  • The original blog posts took place between March 10-12, 2006
  • At Internet Librarian 2006 (October 2006), I synthesized those posts and others into a presentation
  • Then the editor of Public Library Quarterly asked me to write an article based on the presentation – emailed around March 2007, I submitted the article June 2007, it was accepted in July
  • I just edited the galley proof on 5/16/2008

Does anyone see a problem here?

My article is being published more than two years AFTER the original conversation took place. I don’t really fault the journal for their slow time-frame. That’s how it currently works, and my article will hopefully achieve some good: it will point people to the original blog posts and will introduce the topic to non-blog reading librarians. But the original conversation is done. And if I remember correctly, it was a good conversation that branched out in lots of comments and blog posts. Readers of those blog posts could participate. Readers of my soon-to-be-printed article? Not so much.

And now, coming back to peer review. Anymore, when I think of peer review, I think of my blog. I submit an idea in the form of a blog post, and it goes out to quite literally thousands of readers (I’m amazed – thanks for reading!). Each of those readers are my peers – other librarians and emerging tech professionals. And they comment on my ideas… in a matter of hours/days. And I have a chance to respond, to develop the idea further, and to actually interact with my peers. To me, that’s true, useful peer review – instant feedback, criticism, and suggestions from my peers.

Now compare that with the traditional model of peer review – 2-4 anonymous reviewers who grant the right for an article to be published or not. No discussion, no conversation, no interaction. To respond, one has to either write a letter to the editor or write another article – in which case any true discussion is killed.

Which is better peer review?

Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • BlinkList
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Print

{ 15 comments }